Talk:Mark Webber

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mark Webber article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Mark Webber has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
June 14, 2006 Good article nominee Listed

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Australia / Motorsport      (Rated GA-Class) Portal Mark Webber is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. GA Quality: GA-Class Mid Importance: mid This article is supported by WikiProject Australian motorsport. Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Formula One     (Rated GA-Class) This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information. View the task list Discuss the project Help out with Portal:Formula One GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. High This article has been rated as high-Importance on the importance scale. WikiProject Motorsport     (Rated GA-Class) This article is part of a parent project - WikiProject Motorsport - which co-ordinates the motorsport-related WikiProjects, improves areas of commonality, and caters for subjects that lack dedicated projects. Consult the project page for further information. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-Importance on the Importance scale. WikiProject Biography     (Rated GA-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

Mark Webber appeared on portal:Formula One as F1 Selected Article for May, 2006. You can vote for the next selected articles at F1 Selected Articles.

[edit] 2002 results?

Isn't it a bit strange to have that table with Webber's F1 results from 2003 there, without anything for 2002 at least?

any reason a lot of this article is almost a direct copy from Mark Webber's website, here: [1]...? AlbinoMonkey 03:02, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Race profile

The race profile seems to have an error: "Current team {{{Williams F1}}}" is shown. I can't seem to be able to fix this, nothing seems wrong, it's working perfectly for other drivers like Nico Rosberg.

I don't see the error... ??? AlbinoMonkey ^(Talk) 23:48, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Looks like it was temp problem on my side. Thanks Thanh Ha 03:53, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA nomination

I've nominated this as a Good Article - as it's very complete and thoroughly referenced. I'm interested to see whether we can get some F1 articles up to a really good standard, and this seemed like a good one to promote. 4u1e 09:28, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Needs some copyediting and trimming of info, other wise it's a good article so I passed it. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

I removed the trivia section as uncyclopedic and that good articles should not have them. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Wonder if some of them can be built back into the text? 4u1e 06:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

I doubt it, it's mostly his favortie stuff and things like that, violates WP:NOT. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 15:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

I second the nomination. Last time I looked in, around January, 2006, it wasn't bad. Now its a very dyam good entry into Wiki! Congrates to the contribiters - I also agree with 4u1e - this a very good standard. DeafCom 21:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)