Talk:Mark Saville, Baron Saville of Newdigate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Why was this page moved? Proteus (Talk) 15:31, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

I have been going through List of Law Life Peerages, trying to link up the peers with their articles (for example, Anthony Lloyd, Baron Lloyd of Berwick was until recently at Lord Lloyd of Berwick). That list indicated that the "of Newdigate" was not part of the peerage title. Apologies if I am wrong. -- ALoan (Talk) 16:22, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, that list's a bit dodgy — it also cuts short Lord Oliver of Aylmerton, Lord Bridge of Harwich, Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest, Lord Asquith of Bishopstone, Lord Gordon of Drumearn and one of the Lords Russell of Killowen. This page is much more reliable (the bolded bits are part of the title). Proteus (Talk)

Thank you for that - a source! -- ALoan (Talk) 19:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Revolutionary results

Seeing as the inquiry has not yet released its findings, I suggest the comment about "revolutionary results" be excised, or a citation given 82.110.248.146 (talk) 16:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)