Talk:Mark Gasnier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

NEW! Task force on State of Origin NEW!
Want to help improve Rugby league articles? Join WikiProject Rugby league

	The article on Mark Gasnier is supported by the WikiProject on Rugby League, which is to improve the quality and coverage of rugby league related articles on Wikipedia. If you wish this article to be re-assessed, go to our Assessment Department and add it to the list. If you wish this article to be peer-reviewed, go to our Peer Review Department and add it to the list. If you rated this article you may want to leave some comments here on how the article can be improved.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

	This article on Mark Gasnier is supported by the State of Origin task force. The State of Origin task force is to improve the quality and coverage of all articles related to the rugby league version of State of Origin on Wikipedia.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

Portal	Mark Gasnier is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)