Talk:Mark Farmer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance. Related work groups (general): Comics creators work group Related work groups (nations and regions): British comics work group

[edit] Split?

I have never seen such a double entry. This really needs to be split. (Emperor 03:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC))

OK so what to do? Do we move the original Mark Farmer entry [1] to Mark Farmer (comics) and leave this as a disambiguation page? Or do we snip out the other Mark Farmer and provide a disambiguation link to him? Is the other guy notable enough to have his own entry anyway? I Googled for "Mark Farmer" and found a number with a lot of references to the comic MF but the seocnd MF on this page only seems to tur up on his own site. Perhaps we should err on the side of caution and put the extra material in a new entry and let editors who know the field decide its fate (if it is deleted we need to keep an eye on this entry in case this odd doubling up happens again).

My vote is for keeping the comics Mark Farmer here and move the second one to his own page - making a disambiguation page at this stage seems excessive especially if the other one might get deleted.

Thoughts? (Emperor 03:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC))

Yep, keep the commic guy here, just put something like "For the motviation speaker and author, see Mark Farmer (author)." at the top, and move the author info to that new article.--Commander Keane 17:04, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Great thanks - thats all fixed up now. Someone else can decide if the other Mark Farmer is notable enough ;) (Emperor 17:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC))

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)