Talk:Mark Eshbaugh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
Photo request It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.
Maintenance An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

[edit] Books?

I can see photos of the front covers of the man's books -- but amazon.com doesn't seem to mention any of them, copac.ac.uk doesn't . . . Were they published in the normal way, or were they self published or similar? -- Hoary 15:38, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

  • They all appear to be published by RMR Press. The RMR website indicates that they are a new publisher. One of the books doesn't have an ISBN and ISBN.NU can't find any of the others. Brian 08:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)btball

[edit] Notable ?

I can't find any evidence of notability. I can't find the articles used as reference and Google only shows about 50 hits, 19 when duplicates and similar entries are weeded out. None of those are independent reviews. So far, this doesn't look like it's passing the notability and verifiability tests. I'd prod this, but this isn't my area of expertise, so will just tag it for an expert in this field to review Brian 08:56, 16 June 2007 (UTC)btball