Talk:Mark Epstein

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Neutral Point of View

The following remark is not really relevant or necessary, and doesn't seem to clarify much:

The buddha's teaching has always been against the stream

And all of this bellow is something you would normally expect to find as a sales pitch in the back cover of a book, quotation of endorsement included. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, and this is Not very encyclopaedic at all!:

Mark Epstein clears up the confusion [...] by teaching [...].

"Going to Pieces Without Falling Apart is a daring and profound synthesis of intelligence about emotions East and West. The provocative blend establishes Mark Epstein as one of psychology's most dazzling thinkers."

--Daniel Goleman, author of Emotional Intelligence

Please,if you know more about Mark Epstein than I do, improve the writing style and presence of irrelevancies in this article.

I have removed the offending sentence. Good looking out. - Nat Krause^(Talk!) 17:25, 20 May 2006 (UTC)