Talk:Marissa Cooper
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Tense
Can't have dates and the past tense used to describe portrayal of Marissa - too much of a spoiler to those outside North America who won't have seen the end of Season 3 yet. Gunray
Already says it in the article at the very bottom. Already says it in Barton's profile in detail. Already makes multiple references in the OC article and subarticles. It's more confusing to viewers who haven't seen the show yet to see this article out of tense with the rest of the articles. I vote to change to past tense, if it needs to be altered back then it at least must be altered back in all articles to maintain clarity and flow. The article should be changed at the very latest by the end of the week. Mattbwn 23:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
It's not a problem saying it at the end, after the spoiler warning, but it is very unfair to have it prior to such an alert. As for the other articles, I suspsect most will have the information a long way after the spoiler warnings (as it was right at the end of season 3, and people would have to sift through three seasons worth of spoilers to get there.) Gunray
I'm so sad that she died :'( ! --DragonWR12LB 07:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC
When should we finally change this to the past tense? The episode aired in early May. Its June now. And we know she's dead...it says so at the end of the final episode recap on the official homepage Mattbwn 22:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
As soon as the episode airs in the U.K, as season 3 is just drawing to a close there. It's only about 3 weeks away.
I say wait till there's a complaint from someone in the UK. I think we should add on the bottom of this section a save marissa section and about the massive online community effort to save her. Its not hard, a doctor with a defribilator can just happen to drive by and save her life.
Once we do update the page do you think we should give her a born/died tag? For instance "born 1988 (presumably), died 2006". I've noticed other tv characters on here have them, especially the 'Buffy' and 'Angel' ones... Poor Marissa, I'll miss her. :( Ross Nolan 10:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, it's been aired now, in the English-speaking world, so I think we can finally change it to the past tense. Gunray
[edit] alias
is 'coope' really an alias or just a nickname? Ohcl
- No i guess not, more a nickname. (Changed alias to nickname) :-) Matthew Fenton (contribs) 07:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Did Mischa Barton jump or was she pushed?
I was just wondering if the character of Marissa was killed off because Mischa Barton wanted to leave the series, or because she was written out. Has there been anything to suggest one or the other? 195.137.79.247 23:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Last Appearance consensus
i OPPOSE using the last episode. the OC is not a supernatural show. her 'ghost' was not even explicitly her. a flashback does not qualify for the last appearance of a character. by that logic, credits would count, re-runs, and advertisements would have to count. seeing as the OC is somewhat based on a real world, the characters last appearance would have to be either her death or funeral. flashback: when is the last time you saw your next-door neighbor? if you flashback to a time when you last saw your neighbor, does that count as the last appearance of your neighbor? flashbacks are defined as in the past, therefore could not possibly be a last appearance. The undertow 22:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Precisely. The person making these edits isn't even a member. I agree about the ghost not necessarily being Marissa. And technically, Luke, Jimmy, Johnny, and Trey have all appeared in flashback sequences, however it doesn't necessarily mean it was their last canonical appearance. Sillygostly 01:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)\
- And it's getting ridiculous anyway. I've reverted the Marissa article at least 8 times now. :P Sillygostly 01:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Is it vandalism if anons keep inserting this? If so I'd say there's a pretty strong case for getting semi-protection on this article, since it's constantly being added by IPs who aren't contributing to discussions on the talk page. I know it says SP is not for content disputes, but there doesn't seem to be much input from the IPs other than re-insertion of material. I'll put a hidden HTML note in the infobox, not that I believe it will do much good. QmunkE 16:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. The article should be protected as there are no longer any other noteworthy contributions being made to this article. Sillygostly 01:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Is it vandalism if anons keep inserting this? If so I'd say there's a pretty strong case for getting semi-protection on this article, since it's constantly being added by IPs who aren't contributing to discussions on the talk page. I know it says SP is not for content disputes, but there doesn't seem to be much input from the IPs other than re-insertion of material. I'll put a hidden HTML note in the infobox, not that I believe it will do much good. QmunkE 16:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- And it's getting ridiculous anyway. I've reverted the Marissa article at least 8 times now. :P Sillygostly 01:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Marissa's ghost
The last canonical appearance of marissa is infact in the Avengers as on the official site it says that the ghost shown, is hers. Furthermore, i have included the last episode as a last appearance as this has been done for other tv characters, see example, Conrad Gates. *Bree113
- That was not Marissa's ghost, that was just a figment of Summer's imagination, as she mentally visualised Marissa in the room across her's. If Marissa appeared in say, the flashback sequences in the episode The Case of the Franks, then the last appearance could have been amended. A number of TV shows still keep photographs in the background of deceased or absent characters in order to create realism, although it does not count as a last appearance canonically. Sillygostly 01:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Semi-protection
I have semi-protected the article to stop people from removing the display image constantly. Bree113 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 12:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:OC-109.jpg
Image:OC-109.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 10:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:OC-320.jpg
Image:OC-320.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 10:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Marissa's Death.jpg
Image:Marissa's Death.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:OC-104.jpg
Image:OC-104.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)