Talk:Mariano Rajoy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

I just removed one remark on the first paragraph, which informed of Rajoy being "renowned for his inabilty to pronounce the letter "s" (which I believe is rather irrelevant and should, if mentioned at all, be included at the bottom of the article).


<<The "unnecessary" statutory reforms, such as submitted in theCatalan, Andalusian and Galician referenda, supported by percentages as low as 30% of the population of those regions.>>

Lies, lies, lies and more lies and this shit isn't "objective". For example, the "catalan statutory reform" was approved by the 75% of the voters.

a group of facists who have nostalgia of Franco and its repression (1940-1975) dedicates their time to fuck wikipedia Spanish and, as I'm seeing now, the english wikipedia too. Fuck them.

[edit] EpC

Just to mention

  • In Spain there are only two national PTA (AMPAs) confederation, CEAPA (secular), the biggest one, that supports EpC and CONCAPA (catholic) that is against EpC, most of the other remarkable organisations that are aginst EpC are affilated in one way or another to PP or the RACC.
  • On the prospect of Political parties only take account of those in the Cortes, groups of friends dont count. There only PP opposes EpC.
  • Please try to keep a NPOV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zape82 (talkcontribs) 00:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Small edits

I've noticed that somebody is capitalizing nouns that aren't proper nouns. It's a small thing but I thought it would be nice to correct.

<<the derogation of ambitious plans of the previous executive>> On another note this use of derogation looks like a poor translation from spanish to english. Derogar means revoke or abolish or scrap, but derogation is an exemption from or relaxation of a rule or law. Which sense was intended?

[edit] 11th to 14th of March 2004

The three days between the terrorist attack and the general elections were very polemic. The way it is currently mentioned in the article is very similar to the accusations the Socialist Party has been making to Rajoy about his behaviour. Nevertheless Rajoy says his attitude was different, as he and the other members of the government communicated publicly information as it was being known, being actually the first ones to say the possibility that it was not ETA, that no one had announced their participation and that they doubted that ETA had the assets to make a killing 10 times bigger than their previous biggest one (Hipercor Barcelona). I therefore think that all this should be included in the article, eventually mentioning the polemic about it. Does anyone disagree? Escorial82 12:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)