User talk:Maplecelt

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Will Beback has not responed to my email. I feel that my block is unfair as I did not know I had broken a rule. I was just accused of being a sockpuppet. I still do not believe that I have done anything wrong. A lifetime ban is excessive."

Decline reason: "As per Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Vintagekits, it would be inappropriate to unblock you at this time. You may wish to email unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org with a complete description of exactly how you and Vintagekits are related (because there is clearly a relationship there) and explain how you do not believe your actions were inappropriate under WP:SOCK. — Yamla 19:43, 28 June 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "while I know i'm not supposed to repost this here, however will beback didn't feel the need to get back to me nor did I recieve a response from unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org. I apologize in advance but I deserve a response. I fail to see how giving my opinion on an article is wrong. as I previously stated I never knew I was breaking a rule by saying an article should be removed. As was proved in the sockpuppet discussion I have no connection to vintage kits through an external websites. I explained that I emailed him with a question and then I kept an eye on things he was working on the site because I was trying to get hte hang of the site because I would like to get more involved now that I'm finished university for hte summer. in each of hte afds i took part in i gave my own reasons why i felt it should be deleted which have nothing to do with vintagekits or anyone else."

Decline reason: "Please e-mail unblock-en-l again as it appears we may not have received your e-mail. Nick 19:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.