User talk:Mannschaftskapitän

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Flag of Jamtland.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of Jamtland.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Unofficial flag of Vendsyssel.gif listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Unofficial flag of Vendsyssel.gif has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —Pilotguy (go around) 23:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ottoman language Wikipedia

Hello Mannschaftskapitän

I am a history teacher from Istanbul, in Turkey. We need your vote [1] for opening Ottoman language wikipedia

--Tarih 04:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Angela Marcela Pérez Mendoza

A tag has been placed on Angela Marcela Pérez Mendoza, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Metropolitan90 04:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Angela Marcela Pérez Mendoza

A tag has been placed on Angela Marcela Pérez Mendoza, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 04:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I did not delete the article. I am not an administrator, so I do not have the power to do so (nor do I desire it). I merely marked the article as likely meeting the criteria for speedy deletion. And administrator then actually determines whether or not it will be deleted. The article seemed to be pretty obvious is meeting the speedy-delete criteria. If you wish, you may post the article again, and if it is marked for speedy deletion again, immediately post a {{hangon}} tag to announce that you contest the speedy deletion. That will tell admins that you would at least like them to take a look, but it will not guarantee that the article will not be speedily deleted anyway. If you simply need more time to develop the article, put an {{underconstruction}} tag at the beginning to let editors know this is a work in progress. Realkyhick 04:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
An addendum: I went back through my browser to see just why I had tagged the article. The thought of a 21-year-old college student being notable enough to meet Wikipedia notability policies is pretty farfetched, to put it mildly. It is not a matter of authoritarianism, but just common sense. Realkyhick 05:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
If you're basing notability on your own interviews and talks with her, that is considered original research, which is also not allowed on Wikipedia. As for local magazines, you'd have to be a bit more specific, especially if they don't have something you can link to on the Internet. You can get by with just citations of printed matter (see WP:ATT and WP:CITE), but in this case, you're really facing an uphill battle. Someone of her age is simply not likely to have established enough notability in her field to meet Wikipedia's notability standards. She may at some time in the future (and I wish her the best in her endeavors), but she doesn't now.
You can go ahead and try again, but be advised that once you are done, it is highly likely that an editor will put a {{prod}} tag on the article, which proposes it for deletion within five days without objection. If someone (including you) objects, then it is nominated as an article for deletion and undergoes a formal review process. If you should lose that, then you are out of luck until the day came when the subject does establish notability. Realkyhick 05:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:PDVSA.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:PDVSA.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:PDVSA logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:PDVSA logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)