User talk:Mancini
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Talk:Subnetwork
Hi,
Here I put a link which I will explain about below: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Subnetwork#edit_id_91277922_abusive_edit part of your text: "and i was pointing out the history of subnets".
I think your idea about a history section for subnet or subnetmask is a good thing, because I was searching for subnet mask history, because I always thought that the subnet mask was some "invention" of microsoft, and that it was only for microsoft computers, and looking into a history section, I believe would have helped me understand why they "invented" the 'subnet mask'. Anyway I repeat: Good point about a history section in article. Logictheo 19:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edit summaries
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. . I've warned you previously to comment on content not contributors, but it seems you were unable to resist with this edit summary[1].--Crossmr 17:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- You are strange , i shall ignore you from now on and submit my changes for that page to peer review on the talk page.--Mancini 17:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- While I appreciate your effort to remove the personal attacks, once you've made one in an edit summary, I believe only an administrator can remove it. The edit I referenced above was in regards to the way you worded the edit summary, you could have requested assistance without referring to me as unskilled. The point with WP:NPA is to keep your comments on the content of the article, i.e saying "I think that this material X should have been kept in the intro" instead of saying "Editor X is being abusive and censoring me and he's unskilled and his expertise is questioned". I'm sure that between the two of us we can be adults and write a proper article.--Crossmr 17:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Like i said your behaviour is strange to me being so touchy , i do not have interest in personal attacks which is why i edited the summaries , my interest is in the wikipedia networking content --Mancini 17:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- In the past I've dealt with many editors who could not keep the discussion the article and felt the need to continually attack me and behave uncivily towards me. I was perhaps a bit hasty in thinking you might be going the same route, I apologize for misjudging you.--Crossmr 17:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Like i said your behaviour is strange to me being so touchy , i do not have interest in personal attacks which is why i edited the summaries , my interest is in the wikipedia networking content --Mancini 17:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- While I appreciate your effort to remove the personal attacks, once you've made one in an edit summary, I believe only an administrator can remove it. The edit I referenced above was in regards to the way you worded the edit summary, you could have requested assistance without referring to me as unskilled. The point with WP:NPA is to keep your comments on the content of the article, i.e saying "I think that this material X should have been kept in the intro" instead of saying "Editor X is being abusive and censoring me and he's unskilled and his expertise is questioned". I'm sure that between the two of us we can be adults and write a proper article.--Crossmr 17:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Subnet.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Subnet.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 04:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ethernet73.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Ethernet73.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
