Talk:Manny Santos
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Degrassi, an attempt to improve, organize, categorize, and standardize articles about the show Degrassi, and places, characters, and episodes relating to it on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
| TNG | This article is primary related to the Degrassi: The Next Generation series. | |
Contents |
[edit] Need Season One Picture
For illustrative purposes... would be nice if there was one.
[edit] This article needs a complete rewrite
- See Talk:Craig Manning. Royboycrashfan
12:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- I love it, it is so blunt and instructional to the point of being humorus, great use of the verb "proceed" and discussion of penis size
- I attempted to clean up a lot of unnecessary details. Hopefully the article will suffice until someone is willing to do a complete rewrite. Angel caboodle (talk) 21:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- To be honest, I don't know if there's any point. Once a decision has been made at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2/Proposed decision, I think it's likely that most, if not all articles concerning D:TNG characters will be either deleted or merged into the list of DTNG characters. And probably rightly so. They aren't notable enough to warrant their own article. You've done some good work on this one, but the plot is still too lengthy, and it still reads too much like a fansite. It's not really encyclopaedic, and I don't think it ever will be. (Take a look at Pauline Fowler, Jason Voorhees or Jabba the Hutt for excellent character articles.) It'd be good for the Degrassi wikia though. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 00:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I suppose you have a good point. I was unaware of the proposition and I was just making the character articles as legible as possible because most of them read as if a 5-year-old had written them, haha. Thanks for the head's up! Angel caboodle (talk) 01:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- To be honest, I don't know if there's any point. Once a decision has been made at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2/Proposed decision, I think it's likely that most, if not all articles concerning D:TNG characters will be either deleted or merged into the list of DTNG characters. And probably rightly so. They aren't notable enough to warrant their own article. You've done some good work on this one, but the plot is still too lengthy, and it still reads too much like a fansite. It's not really encyclopaedic, and I don't think it ever will be. (Take a look at Pauline Fowler, Jason Voorhees or Jabba the Hutt for excellent character articles.) It'd be good for the Degrassi wikia though. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 00:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- I attempted to clean up a lot of unnecessary details. Hopefully the article will suffice until someone is willing to do a complete rewrite. Angel caboodle (talk) 21:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- I love it, it is so blunt and instructional to the point of being humorus, great use of the verb "proceed" and discussion of penis size
[edit] I don't see what is wrong with it
What is wrong with the article, it looks fine to me. Brainboy109 October 2nd, 2006 13:09 UTC
- This article is way to long. We don't need to do an episode guide for each character on the show. Vivaldi (talk) 10:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, it is LONG! And she is like in EVERY season so.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roedoe (talk • contribs) 16:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:D314.JPG
Image:D314.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
