Talk:Manley Power

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Military work group.
Good article Manley Power has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.

Contents

[edit] GA Consideration

I've decided against doing a speedy fail but currently the article would not pass Criteria 2 of WP:WIAGA. You probably have a good 3 to 5 days before an editor will review the article for full GA consideration. I encourage the editors to work on incorporating in line citations into the article so that it may pass GA considerations. Agne 06:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Passing GA

I like the cites, I like how clear and crisp the information is, and while I have some concerns about the prose, I'm still passing this because of its clarity and the sourcing. I definitely suggest expanding the prose more, but as someone who graduated with a history degree, I know full well how difficult articles like this can be, and this one is good. Keep up the good work, I'll pitch in where I can. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps (Pass)

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. Whilst the GA criteria have changed since this article was originally passed, I believe it still meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review.

For further improvement, we recommend that editors use the templates on WP:CITET to format references; as well as encouraging a uniform style of reference, it allows them to be parsed by bots for automated tasks like tracking down dead web-page links or ISBN conversion.

Thank you for your work and all the best, EyeSereneTALK 18:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reddit Link

This Page was linked on Reddit.com today, so i would anticipate high traffic and many edits, as is already seen from the submissions for "most awesome name." Perhaps editing this article should be locked for a bit? --Jmcstrav talk 17:49, 15 April 2008

  • If a few more things happen. So far, there hasnt' been enough to merit a block IMO. --\/\/slack (talk) 22:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
    • Ok, that's enough. Lock please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wslack (talkcontribs) 23:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
      • that bot is handy. --\/\/slack (talk) 23:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
        • wow, dude, i was looking up how to do that and saw you at the top of the list. well done. --Jmcstrav talk 18:14, 15 April 2008
          • It's also been linked to from digg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.153.51 (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I think this entire section about being on digg for an awesome name is unnecessary and should be removed. In a few hours people will forget it was on digg. - Skyhook19 (talk) 02:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Digg traffic should be over soon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.87.38.78 (talk) 03:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)