Talk:Manley Power
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] GA Consideration
I've decided against doing a speedy fail but currently the article would not pass Criteria 2 of WP:WIAGA. You probably have a good 3 to 5 days before an editor will review the article for full GA consideration. I encourage the editors to work on incorporating in line citations into the article so that it may pass GA considerations. Agne 06:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Passing GA
I like the cites, I like how clear and crisp the information is, and while I have some concerns about the prose, I'm still passing this because of its clarity and the sourcing. I definitely suggest expanding the prose more, but as someone who graduated with a history degree, I know full well how difficult articles like this can be, and this one is good. Keep up the good work, I'll pitch in where I can. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GA Sweeps (Pass)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. Whilst the GA criteria have changed since this article was originally passed, I believe it still meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review.
For further improvement, we recommend that editors use the templates on WP:CITET to format references; as well as encouraging a uniform style of reference, it allows them to be parsed by bots for automated tasks like tracking down dead web-page links or ISBN conversion.
Thank you for your work and all the best, EyeSereneTALK 18:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reddit Link
This Page was linked on Reddit.com today, so i would anticipate high traffic and many edits, as is already seen from the submissions for "most awesome name." Perhaps editing this article should be locked for a bit? --Jmcstrav talk 17:49, 15 April 2008
- If a few more things happen. So far, there hasnt' been enough to merit a block IMO. --\/\/slack (talk) 22:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, that's enough. Lock please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wslack (talk • contribs) 23:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- that bot is handy. --\/\/slack (talk) 23:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- wow, dude, i was looking up how to do that and saw you at the top of the list. well done. --Jmcstrav talk 18:14, 15 April 2008
- It's also been linked to from digg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.153.51 (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- wow, dude, i was looking up how to do that and saw you at the top of the list. well done. --Jmcstrav talk 18:14, 15 April 2008
- that bot is handy. --\/\/slack (talk) 23:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, that's enough. Lock please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wslack (talk • contribs) 23:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think this entire section about being on digg for an awesome name is unnecessary and should be removed. In a few hours people will forget it was on digg. - Skyhook19 (talk) 02:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Digg traffic should be over soon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.87.38.78 (talk) 03:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)