Talk:Manicouagan Reservoir
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Manicouagan Reservoir is part of WikiProject Lakes, a WikiProject which aims to systematically improve lake-related articles using the tools on the Project page. You are welcome and encouraged to edit the article attached to this page and to join the project. |
 |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
|
 |
 |
Manicouagan Reservoir is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
The Triasic terminator is 213mya per several reputable sources, one being the USGS and another the Canadian Museum. 1)USGS:
http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Glossary/geo_time_scale.html
2)Canadian Museum:
http://park.org/Canada/Museum/extinction/timescale2.gif
You may want to review your http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manicouagan_Reservoir. text. The Impact 212+/-2mya does coincide with the Trassic terminator date 213mya.
Dang. This thing DOES look like Strong Sad. UndeniablyJordan 03:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, they even made a joke about it in an easter egg of the new strong bad email
[edit] Split articles?
Most impact craters have their own articles. But while this is one of the larger impact craters on Earth, its article is tacked onto the reservoir article, which is important in itself. I'm giving notice that I intend to separate into two linked articles, in the process beefing up the impact article with more references. --Zamphuor 15:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Strong Sad
No mention that it looks exactly like his head? It even has the disturbing soft-serve flip! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 18:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC).
- It was here for a while, but that is better suited to Strong Sad's article. --Jnelson09 20:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
1,950 square metres? It's much larger than that. That's only a couple of acres.
