Talk:Manga Force: The Ultimate Collection
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. |
[edit] References problem
There is no reference/proof to support that this information has come it's source (the publishers). Also information is innaccurate as no such appology was been made in the issue 12, and no such letter was released to subscribers for the error --Insanityinc 13:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Moreover, the issue 10 that I bought here in Malta (where the last issue to come out is 19 or 20) came with a large sticker on the celophane, informing about the mistake and saying that it would be corrected with issue 12. All in all, the whole section about the Street Fighter Alpha error is rather unnecessary, or at the very least too long. --SeverityOne (talk) 18:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- I disagree that the section is unnecessary. For a magazine of this type to make such a large error is not very common, and is of note. Perhaps the length is too much though. I still have the letter explination of the error, but I'm unsure of the Wiki policy of scanning or if it would be acceptable to scan the letter and use that instead of the typing.--Insanityinc (talk) 23:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well, my point is really that the length of this section is disproportional compared to the length of the entire article. It also sounds almost offended at the grave error; that is the general feeling of the section. Also, it sounds like you received that letter yourself, which would make this original research. After all, there are no references. As for the contents of that letter, that would probably constiture as a breach of copyright, since you're quoting the entire letter. But I'm not an expert on these issues. SeverityOne (talk) 20:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- I disagree that the section is unnecessary. For a magazine of this type to make such a large error is not very common, and is of note. Perhaps the length is too much though. I still have the letter explination of the error, but I'm unsure of the Wiki policy of scanning or if it would be acceptable to scan the letter and use that instead of the typing.--Insanityinc (talk) 23:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mangaforce1.JPG
Image:Mangaforce1.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 10:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Di-disputed fair use rationale issue fixed with a non-template explination. I believe this will solve the issue unless there is a mistake that I have made. --Insanityinc 19:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
