Talk:Man of Sin/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Quality

Start class The article has a meaningful amount of verifiable content. It is already useful to some readers, but it still some way from comprehensive coverage of the topic. Some ideas for expansion are:

• full quote of relevant passages (there aren't too many)
• a suggestive graphic (image, diagram or key writer -- people like pictures)
• links to online text of major opinions (summarized in article)

Alastair Haines 15:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Importance

Mid importance The main reason for giving such a high rating of importance is that many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject. The main reason it is not rated higher in importance is that it is not technically vital to knowledge of the Bible. Eschatology in general certainly is, specifics like the Man of Sin are not. Please take encouragement that Noah's Ark is considered of no importance to understanding the overall message of the Bible.

Alastair Haines 15:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)