Talk:Man'yōshū
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Move to Man'yōshū
I would like to move this page to Man'yōshū. Are there any objections? Bendono 04:26, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me Nik42 05:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- It's been a few days and there has not been any objections. Page moved. Bendono 06:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Move to Manyōshū (no apostrophe)
wp:mos-ja: "Article titles should omit apostrophes after syllabic n."
According to the mos, the article is nder the wrong name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhialto (talk • contribs)
- That needs to be updated. See this discussion for details. Bendono 11:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "Footnotes" or "Notes"?
Conventionally, I've observed a pattern in which "Notes" appear before "References." Here the order is "References" and then "Footnotes."
I started to change it, but then thought twice. It doesn't really matter ... or does it?
I've been making notes accessible using this format/pattern:
- ==Notes==
- {{reflist
- }}
The notes here are captured using this format/pattern:
- ==Footnotes==
- {{cite web
- | title = Online edition of the Man'yōshū
- | url = http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/japanese/manyoshu/index.html
- | publisher = University of Virginia Library :Japanese Text Initiative
- | accessdate = 2006-07-10
- }}
At my current level of Wikipedia expertise, I'm entirely happy to leave these kinds of issues up to someone else. But maybe that's exactly the wrong approach. I wonder ...? Ooperhoofd 17:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Most highly revered?
Are there any cites to suggest that Manyoshu has ever been revered above the Kokin Wakashu?
- Well, uh, what do you think was revered above the Manyoshu before the Kokin Wakashu was compiled? --Gwern (contribs) 02:05 2 August 2007 (GMT)
-
- Touche; I just think the current introduction might lead people to believe that the Manyoshu has always been revered most highly even down to the present day; AFAIK the Kokinshu overtook Manyoshu's place once it was compiled and has never lost its status since then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.180.45.200 (talk) 15:06, 18 September 2007 (UTC)