User talk:Maluka

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

202.47.150.98




Contents

[edit] Wag of the finger

No. I did not leave that remark. The comment was left by Sonic Hog (talk · contribs) as this edit reveals. I did welcome you however. -- Longhair 06:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing that up and the welcome, though I'm not new, just not part of the WikiClique. Now to find just what the Hog meant.Maluka 15:08, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


WTF! Talk pages on Google??? I was under the assumption these are private. I've never seen this until today. I hope there's some way to use robots.txt to block the crawling of these talk pages.Maluka (talk) 03:55, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brandon Cruz

1) trivia sections are considered unencyclopaedic, and should be integrated into the article. 2) most importantly, none of the information was sourced. cheers. --emerson7 | Talk 13:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disappearance of Madeleine McCann

Thank you for your interest in the article Disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Please do not remove sourced material; for example the lawyer's statement. Also we don't use newspaper reports quoting 'sources' - we rely on actual statements. Please use the ((cite web}} format for references. Thanks. TerriersFan 17:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

You don't use newspaper reports quoting 'sources'? The why is the lawyer's statement taken from "http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/06/nmaddy306.xml"==~~

I can't find this anywhere else. I live in Portugal, watch the news and it was never mentioned Kate McCann requested this status. If she had, all the papers are wrong, the TV reporters are wrong and I sense the hand of one of their team in editing this. It changes everything.

Please find other sources to back it up or I'll keep taking it out.

[edit] California Redemption Wikipedia Article

I had to add as many referrences as I could because Wikipedia was going to delete the page if the band's significance wasn't more "verifiable". Thanks for taking off the "notability" tag. :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xbuzzx108 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dr. Know

I was just fixing links to a disambiguation page (see Wikipedia:DAB#Links to disambiguation pages and WP:DPL). As for improving the article, consider dropping your "my OR is the The Truth" attitude, go find some reliable sources and then start doing some referencing. Thanks, Prolog (talk) 13:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

--Sorry but I don't understand your wiki-speak. Drop what?


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Nardcore.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nardcore.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

- - Cruz is a close friend and gave permission to use this. It's impossible to talk about Nardcore and the symbol without seeing it. There is no copyright on something scribbled in a school folder years and years ago.

[edit] Nardcore image

Alright, I'll look at it when you re-upload it and let you know if anything needs to be fixed. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

---Please tell me exactly how to do it...I'm stumped and wikipdedia doesn't make things easyMaluka (talk) 16:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

==Talk pages found on Google! I put this in the wrong place before. Since when can Google crawl talk pages? I thought it was just the main articles. This isn't right.Maluka (talk)

[edit] Nardore

Maluka, I modified Nardcore by removing uncited claims. If you have citations, please add them. The burden is on you to provide citations if you wish to keep those statements. Please see WP:CITE and WP:VERIFY for more information. In particular, please read there that it says "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed." As I am challenging the inclusion of this claim, you should provide a reliable source. If you would like help or have questions about this, please feel free to contact me (again). Cheers, Doctormatt (talk) 18:36, 11 June 2008 (UTC)