User talk:Malinaccier/Archive 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
Welcome
Hi! Welcome to the English Wikipedia!
Hello, Malinaccier, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
And here are several pages on what to avoid:
|
♠TomasBat 22:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Patronus
Hey... I was wondering. In Spells in Harry Potter You said that Lupin's Patronus was a moon... do you have a source for that? I don't think that's true... but I could be wrong. Thanks! Gscshoyru 16:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- You're right, I just looked it up in the Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, and it does not mention anything about the shape of Lupin's Patronous, but it also doesn't say anything about patronuses always being animals. Malinaccier 16:32, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- True... but I think it's assumed, and it should stay as animals. Hermionie's is an Otter, for instance (book 5). Note that Prongs didn't necessarily have a stag as a patronus... he just was a stag animagi. Same with the rest of them. Gscshoyru 16:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- The only thing that discredits the 'animal' patronous is the fact that Nymphadora Tonks' patronous changed into a werewolf (Lupin), and depending on your point of view (whether 'half breeds' are human or not, and whether werewolves should have equal rights with humans), Tonks' patonous was either human or beast. . . . Malinaccier 16:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- Um... werewolf in werewolf form, right? Um... I have no clue how that's considered. Gscshoyru 16:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- We could just say: an object important to the caster. This includes animals, as well as anything else that could be considered non-animal. Malinaccier 16:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Yeah... do that. Makes the most sense, I guess. Gscshoyru 16:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The debate seems to have ended, but may offer my two cents? (And thanks for the barn-star, Malinaccier!) It is never explicitly stated that Tonk's patronus was a werewolf, was it? It is only inferred by the reader - the same way the editors of the Deathly Hallows page will not say if anyone is married in the epilogue. Tried to say it without spoiling if you haven't finished yet! ~~ THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR (((¶))) 08:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
Improper High Level notices
I notice you have been placing high level warning templates on user talk pages for varying degrees of vandalism. Please do not bite the newcomers, and instead post lower level templates for each incident unless the vandalism is unusually malicious. Some of the edits for which you have warned users for may not have been vandalism at all, such as this edit by Sukkomen, where he is describing the attributes of a fictional character. Be aware that such harsh warnings are counterproductive, and damaging to the image of Wikipedia if they are driving good-faith users away. Also, you haven't actually reverted the edits of several users which you cited for vandalism, so please be sure to do so. Finally, sign any talk page notice with four tildes ~~~~ so we can see when they were last warned. Thanks. --Tom (talk - email) 19:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- The only-warning template is typically too harsh; instead, {{subst:test1}} (the standard first-level warning template) should be used most often, followed by test2, test3, and test4. --Tom (talk - email) 19:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
Report the vandal at WP:AIV. However, by looking at the history of the article, I'm guessing the vandal(s?) are using sockpuppets. You may have to ask for the page to be semi-protected (see Wikipedia:Protection policy). Hope that helps! --M1ss1ontomars2k4 02:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Muggle Repelling Charm
Under R or M? There is a tag saying not to move, I don't know who put it there or why - thought it might have been you Malinaccier, in your large "DO NOT EDIT TILL YOU HAVE READ HP7" spree? Or was it an IP? I tried to check the history but it was too far back and I couldn't locate the culprit. Reply to Spells in Harry Potter, please, to keep all related discussion together. ~~ THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR (((¶))) 07:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for your support at my recent Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Angus Lepper RfA, which failed, with no consensus to promote me. However, I appreciate the concerns raised during the course of the discussion (most notably, a lack of experience, particularly in admin-heavy areas such as XfDs and policy discussions) and will attempt to address these before possibly standing again in several months time. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 16:03, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
3RR
Yeah, my reverts are almost exclusively for vandalism. I'll be more careful with my edit summaries in the future. GlassCobra 00:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Help
{{helpme}}
What are projectspace edits. Usually I look these things up, but I don't feel like it today. Thanks in advance. •Malinaccier• T/C 22:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- As I understand it, project space edits are edits made to the Wikipedia namespace (pages with the Wikipedia: prefix). This term can also refer more loosly to edits made to pages for WikiProjects, however the Special:Contributions feature would not be able to distinguish those edits, as WikiProjects are located within the Wikipedia namespace. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 23:11, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! •Malinaccier• T/C 23:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment
Thank you for your comment on my RfA, which was successful. LyrlTalk C 01:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 17:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Happy birthday!
Have a wonderful day! umdrums 05:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Spells in Harry potter
It is currently under a deletion review. Therequiembellishere 17:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Spells in Harry Potter and WikiProject Redwall
Hey man, thought you'd like to know that there's been a deletion review set up for Spells in Harry Potter.
Also, I noticed that you're a fan of the Redwall series. Would you like to come join our Redwall WikiProject? If you're interested, add your name to the Participants list. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions! GlassCobra 00:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Spells in Harry Potter
An article that you have been involved in editing, Spells in Harry Potter, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spells in Harry Potter (3rd nomination). Thank you. Jreferee (Talk) 03:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Adoption
Sorry for not replying to your adoption request sooner. I had actually been adopted the same day you sent the message. Thank you anyway! --Endlessdan 12:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Harry Potter roll-call
{{User WP Harry Potter}}
to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. Conversely, if you do not wish to be considered a member of the WikiProject, leave your name where it is and it will be moved to the Inactive Contributors section. If you wish to make a clean break with the Project you may move your name to the Known to have left section. Many thanks.WikiProject Redwall Roll-Call
Reply to your comment on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/markles
On the contrary:
A) I won't relish it at all - it's just something I'll do from time-to-time.
B) I wouldn't be crazy - it doesn't mean that much to me.
C) Nobody could get in my way - there are no individual ways, just the Wikipedia policies.
—Markles 02:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pedro 2
I thought you should be aware that you've had responses to your !vote. --Dweller 10:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Same goes for Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dreadstar. Wikidudeman (talk) 14:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Ummm,
I need all the help I can get, but... you already !voted.
Thanks, though, for the original support, and giving me the benefit of the doubt. --barneca (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
RFA Thanks
Dreadstar RfA
Thanks for your support, I took the easy way out of thanking everyone by borrowing someone else's thank you card design...but know that I sincerely appreciate your support and confidence in me! I also greatly appreciated your staunch defense..! Dreadstar † 05:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Re: Weak Oppose for RfA for Captmondo
Hello there:
Before answering your opposition I just wanted to be sure that we are talking about the same thing: could you define what you mean by "wikispace edits"? I am assuming that this means working on procedural tasks (i.e. Feature Article and Good Article nominations, and discussions on same), right?
Perhaps asking this question alone disqualifies me for Adminship, but I'd rather be an informed than blunder into a baseless response.
Cheers! Captmondo 19:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for the response. I hadn't realized that that was a prerequisite for Adminship, but am certainly up to the task. I may or may not make it as an Admin this time around, but in any event I will make more of an effort to contribute to this area to the best of my ability. Cheers! Captmondo 02:08, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
My knowledge of policy
Hi,
Thanks for sounding off your opinion on my RFA.
You asked to prove my knowledge of policy on your talk page.
I don't exactly know how do you want me to prove it, but if you want to test me in any way, go ahead. As I said in the discussion there - I read the policy back and forth a long time before I nominated myself. Because the policy documents are so well written, I didn't need to ask for much help about them - I can read them myself. I don't think that I need to participate in a discussion of a policy document to be able to implement it correctly.
If you still want tangible proof, take a look at the list of AFD's that I proposed. The list is not long, but I think that it's enough of a proof. Most of them were eventually deleted, which proves my good understanding of what Wikipedia is and what it is not. I also withdrew some of them in a friendly manner, which proves that I can learn from mistakes.
If there is anything more that I can clarify, please tell me. Thanks in advance. --Amir E. Aharoni 07:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
YARRR
Happy International Talk Like a Pirate Day! | ||
Ahoy! How 'bout a jug o' grog, me hearty? Regarrrrds, GlassCobra 17:02, 19 September 2007 (UTC) |
Barneca RfA thank you spam
Malinaccier, thank you for your support during my RfA, especially after the concerns that were brought up by other editors. I'll keep all of the comments in mind in the coming months, and will try again later (and I'll have more wikispace edits by then, too!). In the mean time, if you see me doing something stupid, please let me know. See you around. --barneca (talk) 12:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
The now-traditional RFA thank-spam
RFA Thanks!
Thanks for your participation for my RFA bid and for your support.--JForget 23:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Hi,
I succeeded at my RfA nomination.
I strongly believe in the "a discussion is not a vote" policy and the concerns that you raised were civil and challenging, so I thank you for that. --Amir E. Aharoni 23:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Nehrams2020 RfA Thanks
Edokter RfA
Dear Malinaccier,
Thank you for your participation in my Request for Adminship, which ended succesfully with 26 supports, 3 opposes and 1 neutral. A special thanks goes to Rlevse for nominating me. I appreciate all the support and constructive criticism offered in my RfA. Please do not hesitate to point out any errors I will make (unintentionally of course), so I won't make them again. Please contact me if you need anything done, that's what I'm here for! |
Thanks!
My RFA | ||
Thanks for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 58 supports, 1 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified. Addhoc 18:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC) |
Fabrictramp RFA
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 50 supports, 1 neutral, and 1 oppose. My goal is to keep earning your trust every time I grab the "mop". (And I'm always open to constructive criticism and advice!) Again, thanks. --Fabrictramp 15:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Three Revert
Are you honestly quoting policy at me? Come on, man, you know me. Whatever happened to giving established editors the benefit of the doubt? My reverts are exclusively to improve the article. I'm not going to apologize for violating the rule, as I did it in the best interest of the article and the project. I'll revert my edits, but someone else needs to clean up after me. GlassCobra 02:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- I highly doubt I'll be banned for acting in the best interest of the project. I may have broken the letter of the law, but I was still upholding it in spirit. My annoyance with you stems merely from you unnecessarily quoting policy at me, a user who has not only read the policy, but warned others in the past about it. GlassCobra 02:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)