User talk:Malarious
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] United Kingdom
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.--John 16:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Please can you give a transcription of the passage from the source you give which supports your "Great Power" claim, and do not make edits which are likely to be contested without using edit summaries. Viewfinder 15:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
You might also like to contribute to the talk page at Great Power. Viewfinder 15:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Italy
Wikipedia is not your soapbox for removing references and replacing American spellings with British spellings when the former is already more prevalent. See WP:ENGVAR. Sicilianmandolin 19:39, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nation
Hello,
Just a note that a nation is a community or group of people (e.g. the Nation of Islam or The Nation of Gods and Earths), it is not a division of land. England is a territory, not a group of people - the English people are a nation. In this capacity, and as it has no official meaning or source, I've removed it again from the lead per policy.
I hope that helps explain the removal. -- Jza84 · (talk) 19:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- I've actually raised this at Talk:Scotland. It is a somewhat problematic situation (in my point of view) that this wording endures on this article. -- Jza84 · (talk) 23:19, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Edits to Scotland
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. SFC9394 (talk) 21:20, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
- Please use talk pages to obtain consensus. I raised your point at Talk:Scotland and did not know you were edit warring in the background. It is best practice to talk about edits that have been reverted rather than reinstate them in quick succession and with no formal discussion. Hope to see you around again, but on the talk page! -- Jza84 · (talk) 01:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Hello. Please don't forget to provide edit summaries. Thank you. Schcamboaon scéal? 16:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to England. Thank you. --Jza84 | Talk 22:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] England
Looks like you are getting into another edit war. Constituent Country was agreed on the talk page both here and on Wales. If you don't agree go to the talk pages. --Snowded (talk) 16:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to United Kingdom, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. (Removing referenced information without an edit rationale.) Schcamboaon scéal? 15:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] June 2008
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Pretty please?! They really don't take all that long! Thanks. Schcamboaon scéal? 14:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to United Kingdom, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Schcamboaon scéal? 16:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
