Talk:Malar rash
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess. |
| Stub | This page has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality assessment scale |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance assessment scale |
[edit] Proposed merge with Lupus erythematosus
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was no merge. Skeezix1000 00:39, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. The symptom deserves its own article as a dematologic condition. The rash alone does not define SLE -- a person needs to have 4 out of the 11 criteria. Nephron T|C 00:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. IMHO FWIW MartinGugino 00:48, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. I found it via the link when viewing SLE, I think it should remain separate music6 13:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Picture
A picture would be helpful. --Savant13 15:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Hell no. Whenever I click a link to a disease page on wikipedia I look at the page first without glasses (prescription -10, crippling short sightedness is an advantage sometimes) to avoid disgusting pictures. Pictures of skin conditions are the worst.
A picture would only be acceptable if it were behind a link (ie not visible unless you actually want to see it) and with a red warning (ie "GRAPHIC") Communisthamster 23:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
It's a rash, not a gruesome injury or parasitic infestation or surgery. A picture would indeed be helpful. 206.21.160.136 00:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
