Talk:Malachim (Hasidic group)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Joke?
Is this a joke? --Bear and Dragon 13:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- ...I don't get it. --Yodamace1 15:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Why do you think this is a joke? Yossiea (talk) 16:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- It sounds quite absurd and I have never heard of it. The sources are also not that impressive. --Bear and Dragon 17:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Daniel575, your never hearing about it is irrelevant. It is quite well known in the US. Most people who know a bit of American Jewish history have heard about the Malachim. Yossiea (talk) 17:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- You've never heard of it because it was a largely isolated historical incident which did not result in the culmination of any modern movements which seem to have a future and Rabbi Berel Wein doesn't overview such things. But if Harvard University Press doesn't impress you, what you want? --Yodamace1 22:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- It was also mentioned in "American Judaism" by Jonathan Sarna. Yossiea (talk) 01:02, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- I don't particularly care what Berel Wein says. And I have simply never heard of this group. How numerous are they? --Bear and Dragon 07:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's fine, but what's not impressive about the sources? They're tiny, almost dead in fact. How many malachim are there? Good question, I don't know...my guess (not hypothesis) would be less than a hundred. --Yodamace1 15:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- I don't particularly care what Berel Wein says. And I have simply never heard of this group. How numerous are they? --Bear and Dragon 07:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- It was also mentioned in "American Judaism" by Jonathan Sarna. Yossiea (talk) 01:02, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- You've never heard of it because it was a largely isolated historical incident which did not result in the culmination of any modern movements which seem to have a future and Rabbi Berel Wein doesn't overview such things. But if Harvard University Press doesn't impress you, what you want? --Yodamace1 22:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Daniel575, your never hearing about it is irrelevant. It is quite well known in the US. Most people who know a bit of American Jewish history have heard about the Malachim. Yossiea (talk) 17:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- It sounds quite absurd and I have never heard of it. The sources are also not that impressive. --Bear and Dragon 17:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Why do you think this is a joke? Yossiea (talk) 16:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Satmar
I removed the Satmar bit because it is too vague, unreferenced, violates WP:OR and is just not notable enough even if true to be included. Yossiea (talk) 16:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] dynasty?
Why is this group called a dynasty, which this encyclopedia defines as "a succession of rulers who belong to the same family for generations." There was no dynasty. I suggest that the title be changed to "Malachim (Hasidic group)". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yehoishophot Oliver (talk • contribs) 20:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)