User talk:Makemewish

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Humour

I really, really laughed at this comment: "Damn and I grew up believing this all along. Well, back to writing my letter to Santa." I thank you.

The only other thing is (forgive me) but I think I'm talking to Sixstring. Tell me I'm wrong. (You give yourself away by wiping your page. I don't mind, but others will... :) --andreasegde (talk) 00:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

BTW, I accept that you will not go away, and I don't really understand the fuss, but as long as you're here in a positive way I have no problem with that. You are persistent, are you not? --andreasegde (talk) 00:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't. I can keep finding you and kepp having you blocked until you get tired or find something shiny to distract you. If this is Sixstring, please do yourself the favor and simply go away. Don't make me chase you down. I will always stop you. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 01:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Let's STOP the silly, childish editors that write "Lennon was a Wan*er", as they do... I think that is more important. I know this is Sixstring, as we all do, but he is only leaving positive coments. I don't understand this thing at all, it makes me feel ill, and makes me want to stop working on Wiki. --andreasegde (talk) 01:50, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

A silly vandal is just that; they are clowning around and not taking the project seriously. Big deal. What Sixstring represents, by sockpuppeting is a total f*ck-you to Wiki polices, and that is unacceptable. I've written more on your talk page. He was blocked. He has a way back, but socking is not that way. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 01:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

I think Sixstring does take it seriously, but he does very, very silly things now and then (are you listening Sixstring?) --andreasegde (talk) 02:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, what they said. Makemewish (talk) 03:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)