User talk:Majorly/Archives/12
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 4 | 22 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
| Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag | WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness" |
| News and notes: Talk page template, milestones | Wikipedia in the News |
| Features and admins | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Thanks for nominating me for admin. I withdrew when it became clear that the uphill climb had crossed the snowball threshold, but I appreciate your support and the process gave me some good ideas for other ways I can be contributing to Wikipedia. I'll work on the areas that came up in the discussion, and try again after I've gained wider experience. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
RfAs
Thanks Majorly, I really appreciate the feedback. :) Daniel and Brad were both very patient as I took ages to write both nominations. I hope you have a nice day, too. Cheers, Sarah 14:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
delete reason
Can you add a bit of explanation to your closing of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of transfers of Serie A - 2007/2008 season ? Most of the delete votes were citing WP:CRYSTAL, however, with citations added to the article, that policy clearly is irrelevant. So, I'm curious as to the rationale for the delete decision. Regards. Neier 23:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of transfers of Serie A - 2007/2008 season. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Neier 12:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Eponymous heroines
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of literary works with eponymous heroines. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <KF> 11:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
American Brit
I believe that American Brit has returned from the dead under another new name. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Golden_User. He is a bad speller like American Brit, has shown interest in the Coronation Street article, and posted a message on my talk page relating American Brit vs. Me as an IP incident. --YoungOcelot 03:02, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Now I see why you were questioning me about American Brit. You think I am him. I went and posted a compliment to a user nad he jumps down my throat and accusing me of being a imatation. I cant find any information on this American Brit, a talk page or contribution page. What was he banned for? Why do you think I am him? I have only been on Wikipedia for one week Golden User (Gold Hearted) 15:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Are you going to respond? Golden User (Gold Hearted) 15:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Well if you can readd why cant you answer? Golden User (Gold Hearted) 21:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I already answered your question on your userpage. Please do not continue bugging me about it. --Majorly (talk) 21:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I did not see it but I do now. I am sorry I bothered you so much. I was just worried. But again Im sorry. Golden User (Gold Hearted) 21:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Apology accepted. --Majorly (talk) 21:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. Being a new user, and you being a more established one may I come to you if I have a question about Wikipedia? Golden User (Gold Hearted) 21:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
If you must. But if you need admin attention one of the appropriate pages, might be quicker. --Majorly (talk) 21:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/American Brit -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 21:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Majorly, how do you check a users past contributions? That is the only way I can find some pages that wont come up in the search bar. Golden User (Gold Hearted) 22:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Special:Contributions/Username. Replace username with the user's name. If you go to a user's page, there should be "User's contributions" on the left in the toolbox under the search button. --Majorly (talk) 22:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Okay thank you. And I will stop asking so much questions. I just am trying to learn my way around Wikipedia is all. Golden User (Gold Hearted) 22:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
2007 Wikipedia sandbox collapse
Hi. Why was the sandbox deleted multiple times, why was a page created called Pepperboi, Wikipedia:Sanboxtemp? What started it all, did the sandbox get moved? I couldn't see all of what happened, and the sandbox history is gone, and it is confusing, and why are all those pages on my watchlist? Thanks. AstroHurricane001(Talk+Contribs+Ubx) 23:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- A user moved it several times - unfortunately, the page was unprotected to moves. I attempted to move it back, and the database froze a few times. The histoy should still be there. --Majorly (talk) 23:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies for having interloped in your cleanup of the move vandalism; I didn't think it particularly important that we preserve the history of the sandbox and intended simply to return the header to the sandbox and tag sandboxtemp for speedy, but my recreation of the sandbox was inadvertent—I left a tab open a good while and didn't refresh prior to saving—and I'm sorry for the odd inconvenience. Cheers, Joe 23:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
lotion-play article
Hi, my article on this was deleted as unreferenced, but I just got a book whick describes it, its available here (and shows lotion play on the cover) http://www.amazon.com/Pink-Box-Inside-Japans-Clubs/dp/0810992590/sr=1-4/qid=1160164645/ref=sr_1_4/104-7370955-4750367?ie=UTF8&s=books can I repost the article, with this as a reference? thanks Urso 21:10, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- If you wish to, you can. One reference may not be enough though, so make sure everything in the article is covered by it if you can't find another. --Majorly (talk) 21:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- I have reposted it with additional references; Lotion-Play, if there is any problem let me know, thanks again Urso 22:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Worried About An IP Address
Hello User:Majorly. Im hopeing you can help. I spotted that someone had been editing my user page very early this morning. I cant quite explain what the person was trying to do. But I tracked the IP and it seems suspicous. Can you have a look and see how this person got details of my computer?[[1]] Its on the bottom of my main page. JFBurton 20:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
J Di
Hi. I saw your post on the requests for arbitration page concerning User:J Di. As I indicated in my comment, I think the current arbitration request is based on a thread in which the filing party is the one who acted very poorly, and has no chance of being accepted. Additionally, ArbCom always looks for evidence of prior attempts to resolve the dispute, and there is no indication that that has been tried either.
Of course, if there are any future problems, that doesn't prejudice your right to take any action that might be appropriate. Newyorkbrad 17:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm privileged to have never been involved with ArbCom, or any sort of serious dispute, so I don't have much of a clue how it works. I've had problems with J Di for a while now, but I hadn't thought it appropriate to report. But now I see other users are fed up with him as well, I thought I might leave a comment. What do you think I should do? This ArbCom request will probably go nowhere, seeing as the requesting user is relatively new, and frankly didn't help themselves in the argument. Should I request an RfC? My experience of these seems to be nothing happens with them. I have tried talking to J Di over the IRC but he was incredibly difficult to talk to. I would appreciate your opinion. As I said, I have a good deal of evidence of disputes and incivility from this user. --Majorly (o rly?) 17:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for asking my opinion. I've never interacted with J Di before, so I didn't know that there were issues with him beyond this one user's dispute from over the weekend. Typically, the first step is to try discussing things with the admin or user in question, not just on IRC (which leaves no usable record of the interaction) but on-wiki as well. If that doesn't work, RfC is supposed to be the next step; you're right that they don't typically result in action, but sometimes they result in improved behavior, and if the RfC doesn't get anywhere you can tell ArbCom that at least you tried.
- Again, though, I don't know any background to the disputes you say you've had with J Di, or how chronic or recent they were, so I can't advise on whether you should pursue the matter, or leave it alone unless/until another incident arises. Still, hope this helps. Newyorkbrad 18:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Your break
Hi. I was surprised to see you redirecting your userpage just a few minutes after my comments on your talkpage. I'm assuming that's not cause and effect! Anyway, have a good break, but I do hope we'll see you back soon; and if your break is related to anything that's occurred on-wiki, please let me know if I can be helpful in resolving it. Regards, Newyorkbrad 04:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Happy Valentines Day!
 |
I wish you and your family have a wonderful Valentines Day! |
Kamope · talk · contributions 21:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RfA stats
Wow, a very nice chart. It will be used a lot in WT:RFA discussions (everyone loves discussing standards and the extremes of successful RfAs). I think a lot of people will get some good value from this. I know putting these sort of charts together is a lot of work. I would add a column to identify self noms, but before you do that you ought get some opinions from others who may have better ideas. For proper sorting, you may want to order dates by year/month/date and make the month numerical. Anyway, this could grow into the definitive analysis of RfA stats if you want it to. Very nice. NoSeptember 23:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Smile
Destructo 087 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
{{RfA talk}}
Haha, thanks for reminding me. I discussed it on WT:RFA and have completely forgotten. oops ;) I'll try and remember in future. James086Talk 08:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC-5)
- Ah, that'd make life a lot easier. Question: Why are the instructions on the template page less helpful than yours? Xiner (talk, email) 09:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
Thanks!
Although my RfA will probably not pass, I would like to thank you for supporting me. Have a nice day! ~ Flameviper Who's a Peach? 12:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC-5)
I would also like to thank you for banning a vandal for me on the Navy Field article. It's still under attack right now though, but thanks for the help. --Lord Kelvin 14:01, 9 February 2007 (UTC-5)
Template:Smiley
Why did you close the debate as "recreated content"? The last time it was deleted was 2005... and recreated content is for speedy deletes... this does not qualify. Please reopen the debate. --Majorly (o rly?) 11:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC-5)
- Actually, CSD G4 applies to content previously deleted through an XfD process. I'd already put in a request for a bot to orphan this template when the new TfD discussion began. (Had I noticed it, I would have closed it sooner.) —David Levy 11:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC-5)
Kemps Landing Magnet School
I think you deleted the AfD page instead of the article... just letting you know. --Majorly (o rly?) 10:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC-5)
- Yes you are right. Many thanks for pointing out my mistake. Fixed now. Cheers TigerShark 10:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC-5)
thanks (afd)
D'oh! Bucketsofg 12:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC-5)
Hee hee
I kind of noticed what was going on, I researched into it, I just make sure those type of things don't bug me :). Thanks for your concern, it means a lot. Cheers buddy. ~ Arjun 20:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC-5)
Personal
Thank you. I am humbled to find how many friends I have whom I did not know about.--Anthony.bradbury 11:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC-5)
Article Deletion
I noticed that you recently deleted the article on Unity Area Ambulance. According to the debate the vote was split right down the middle as 3 votes for delete and 3 for keep. There is no majority there. Please restore the articles you destroyed. Eric 00:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
- It isn't majority, it's consensus. If you don't like it, request a deletion review. --Majorly (o rly?) 02:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funday PawPet Show
Hello. Any chance that you could look over this debate again? You closed it as keep, but I'm failing to see how a single newspaper article several years ago satisfies the "multiple non-trivial" criterion per the web inclusion guidelines. (It's not that I doubt the existance of the piece, by the way.) If you're happy with your close, would you be insulted if I took it to deletion review? - brenneman 01:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
- No, I wouldn't be insulted. I'd rather it got reviewed than closed wrongly. --Majorly (o rly?) 02:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
Tom Flores
Erm, there's been two unregistered editors this month. Why have you semi protected the page? --Robdurbar 04:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
- Mistakenly protected. I unprotected it just now. --Majorly (o rly?) 04:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
- Cool - we've all done it once in a while! --Robdurbar 04:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
- It seems that the Tom Flores page is being caught up in the same edits as Mike Ditka, which has been sprotected; maybe they both should be. Andy Saunders 06:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
- Cool - we've all done it once in a while! --Robdurbar 04:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
Your RFA nomination
Hi Majorly, Thank you very much for your nomination request. It's things like this that make the work I do here all the more worthwhile. I'm sure you've looked through my editing history, but I put myself up for nomination a couple month or so back to help out with the work I'm doing with the warning templates. I pulled out of that as the crazyrussian and a few others raised the valid point that I'm not really an article writer, and my edits are primarily minor back room or organisational stuff. Unfortunately that hasn't changed and the fact I now look at RFA's and I feel that you need to be close to saint hood and an expert in every facet of wikipedia to pass an RFA these days. I also screwed up an AfD a couple of months ago, trying to close it out when I didn't have the right, this will get jumped upon for not knowing policy, etc. (Silly mistake I know, all in my talk pages, was part of some coaching I was doing with MartinP23). RFA's get jumped on for the smallest thing and this would no different in the same way I see the 1FA has reared it flamin head again which you commented on. Yes I would be willing to help the community more, but if I don't go for this RfA I have more than enough work to keep me going for the near future. Please check out my history in more detail, I have no problems if you re-think your decision. Again many thanks it's appreciated and kind regards. Khukri - 17:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
Brit again!
A couple days ago, I removed a message from a user's talk page that was a personal attack. Another user who I believe may be American Brit posted a message on my talk page, saying that it was vandalism and I would be banned. He tried to make it look like an official warning, too. Some user came and deleted the warning, but it's still in my history. Please check this guy out. --YoungOcelot 23:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
Oops, nevermind. I checked this guy's talk page, and he's already been confirmed as a puppet account and blocked. --YoungOcelot 23:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC-5)
Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 6 | 5 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC-5)
BNP protection
Can you please update the time when the page protection expires on the British National Party page.--Lucy-marie 20:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC-5)
When the next page protection would expires because the current tag has expired.--Lucy-marie 20:33, 6 February 2007 (UTC-5)
My RFA
 |
My request for adminship was closed a day early with a tally of 98/0/3, so I am now an administrator. Thanks very much for your confidence. If there's anything I can ever do to help, please don't hesitate to contact me. If I screw up, please feel free to let me know about that, too. Kafziel Talk 10:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC-5) |
