Talk:Majestic plural

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] History tidied

It only contained some discussion of poor examples that had been removed, and lots of 'fwappling' about how to do links - it's all in this talk page's history if you have lots of time to waste ! Sorry, but 'Be Bold' is an accepted principle, even on article pages, let alone talk pages !

--195.137.93.171 (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Better Example ?

I would even consider removing "In agreement with the Imperial Duma We have thought it well ..." as possibly being genuine plural, (a bit like 'My husband and I' could lead Queen Elizabeth II to use 'we' as a real plural) or maybe just poor Russian -> English translation ? "We thought it Our duty of conscience to facilitate for Our people the closest union possible ..." may be a better example from the same reference.

--195.137.93.171 (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Capitalisation

Capitalisation is sometimes used to indicate PM - should that be mentioned in the article ?

--195.137.93.171 (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed move: Pluralis majestatis → Majestic plural

According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English). FilipeS (talk) 21:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)