Talk:Mahmoud Khatami

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is part of the article assessment section of WikiProject Muslim scholars, a WikiProject for all articles about Muslim scholars. Note: The project includes non-Muslim scholars of Islam.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (core areas): Metaphysics Related task forces (major fields): Philosophers

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

[edit] What does "ontetic" mean?!

Or how can we use this term before its already confusing meaning has been given later in the article?!

[edit] Cleanup

This article needs a lot of cleaning up and wikifying. DrL 15:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

At this point, I'd settle for an occasional paragraph break. I tried, but gave up after my head started to hurt. RandyKaelber 21:30, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

I found this in Category:Wikify from September 2006. Well... I can see why it's remained there for so long! I've added some paragraphs in what I hope are appropriate places, and corrected some typos. My head hurts now, too. It makes me wonder if we can have too much information in a WP article? --Smalljim 13:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I did a quick wikification job on it and removed the tag. Clean-up tag remains. The article is FAR too long. It should just give an introduction to his work, how he relates to other philosophers, to what makes him important and different. If people want more they will have to read the books. From the article as it stands I get that he is a very innovative and important thinker, a bridge between Islamic and Western philosophy, but I don't get any more because there is just too much to plough through. Itsmejudith 21:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)