User talk:Magiko
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Polo Piatti, if you think you are notable, you can raise the matter at deletion review. -- RHaworth 16:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Winkleisland.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Winkleisland.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Old town hastings
A tag has been placed on Old town hastings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A1.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 19:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Winkle club
A tag has been placed on Winkle club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 19:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Old town week
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Old town week, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 19:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Winkle club
A tag has been placed on Winkle club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bearian 20:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Hastings old town week
A tag has been placed on Hastings old town week, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A1.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Postoak 06:19, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Youngdancers.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Youngdancers.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 07:20, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Towncrier.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Trowncrier.jpg. The copy called Image:Trowncrier.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 12:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Winkle Island merger
Magiko,
I can see the rational for keeping the Winkle Island article separate from the Hastings article. The Hastings article has grown fairly large already, and adding a little information with a link to Winkle Island seems like it would be a good thing. As a matter of fact, I think it would be good to do with the Hastings Old Town article as well. I'll go ahead and remove the merger notices from both of the articles and mark them as stubs for future expansion. If you want to add a bit of information to the Hastings article about Winkle Island so it can be linked, go right ahead!
In the future, you can just leave a message on my user talk page rather than sending me an email about it. Cheers! :-)
--Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 01:52, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Procession2.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Procession2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 07:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Seafood and Wine Festival
A tag has been placed on Seafood and Wine Festival, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 09:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome
|
[edit] Hello...
Hello Magiko,
First of all you thank you for some of the edits you've been making so far, and well done for uploading so many good images, however I've noticed you've had an article deleted and one nominated for deletion. You may have a had a look through some of the links on my welcome message, but I think it would help if you had a look at Manual of Style and Featured articles you should get a feel of how a good wikipedia article is written, I don't expect you to read all of it as it is quite a long read! But hopefully you'll pick up the basics of how to make good constructive contributions to Wikipedia.
I see you've uploaded a few pics, which is brilliant! However there can be too many images on an article which become more of a nuisance than constructive, I did a rewrite of the Hastings Old Town article, so it looks better presented and doesn't have an excess of images. Please don't feel that you should stop uploading, as you can still upload images onto this site.
Regards
The Menace 17:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tango
Please find published references to reinforce your changes to the various tango pages. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 20:23, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] December 2007
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Carl.bunderson (talk) 07:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Carl.bunderson (talk) 07:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
-
- This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Carl.bunderson (talk) 07:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
-
-
-
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Carl.bunderson (talk) 08:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
-
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
-
Please provide references for each and every change you make to the Tango pages. There are many opinions about the history of Tango and very little absolute truth: all we can do is compare and contrast the various referenced opinions. You can't simply change the text to be what you prefer it to be. You must have reputable sources and cite them. Binksternet (talk) 01:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC)