Talk:Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Portal	Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law.
Assessment comments The following comments were left by the assessors: (edit · history · watch · refresh) Contents 1 Must be nice, help Support low fines for rich people 2 Name of Court 3 Court contains other offices, the Passive Pedophiles and Spanners don't want to know about THE FACT 4 This court files DVO documents without reporting to child protection 5 Hearings are made private by Stanhope Government to save money 6 Registrars are not responsible for their action/s 7 Media reporting of FACT is permitted to be turned into ANY IDEAL to sell ANYTHING 8 Law altered by Local Government to save money and remove responsibility for CRIMINAL failure 9 Registrars will refuse legal papers at filling desk [edit] Must be nice, help Support low fines for rich people In recient times of 2007, a Minister of the ACT Government failed a Drink Driving Test, and was told with words to the effect by the court that he was to face no charge 'for the good of the community' - unknown if a plea was entered (a lawier is about 000000.50% of 100k?) The Minister is on about 100k a year, and would at most only ever pay less than 000001.0% of his yearly income on a driving offence. In cars that do twice the legal speed limit, with Speed Camera Cash Cows that do not stop people (rich people are always in a hurry so they have more time to lobby for less tax). This Court supports killing people and keeping them in poverty with higher rates of fines per low-income, so it and it's NSW partner can exploit people -keeping the streets safe for rich. While it turns a bind eye to the "Social Plan" by federal and state Governments. Next year is the ACT/NSW planned Kull of humans on low incomes for medical tests (rich get trained doctors). Hitler must be rolling!

[edit] Name of Court

Section 4 of the Magistrates Court Act 1930 (ACT) states:

(1) The Magistrates Court is continued in existence.

Correct name of court therefore appears to be Magistrates Court rather than Magistrate's Court. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Assize (talk • contribs) 05:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Court contains other offices, the Passive Pedophiles and Spanners don't want to know about THE FACT

The Court contains an office named 'la legal aid act'. Removing this fact makes you a spanner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.54.191.7 (talk) 17:06, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This court files DVO documents without reporting to child protection

In 2001 this court allowed Domestic Voilence Orders to be filled without reporting to child protection authorities as required by Commonwealth law. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.54.191.7 (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hearings are made private by Stanhope Government to save money

Orders can be made in back rooms without Judge. Where-in the registrar are not responsible for the information they provide. To get Orders signed by respondants the registrar will lie and state orders have the same conditions on both parties. Orders filled in this manner are counted towards the registrars payment scheme (the more the registrar saves, the more money the registrar is payed as he/she is able to climb the ladder of payment scale, to become a sitting Judge, or other). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.54.191.7 (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Registrars are not responsible for their action/s

Registrars can lie to aquire signage of CROWN papers, this FACT is noted with little signs of the size of a small envelope that are HIDDEN behind lines of people. The reason people are taken into little rooms is so the Registrar can verbaly abuse them.

Registrars can make up FACTS to suit a personal IDEAL, and not that of LAW.

As an example: A male respondant will be required to attend while the Female applicant does not need to attend. The REGISTRAR if he/she can badger the respondant will then make another booking for a new sitting (this act is against the law). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.54.191.7 (talk) 17:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Media reporting of FACT is permitted to be turned into ANY IDEAL to sell ANYTHING

The Media is permitted by this court to use as little as ONE FACT and wrap that into ANY IDEAL it can for use in COMMERCIAL MEDIA without disclosure, or stating Authors name.

This ILLEGAL action is used by Commercial interests to benfit its syndication partner/s, and discredit others for commercial gains.

The commercial media is protected by this court whom also has press releases to benfit Commercial Media and its own idealisms (and not that of the law). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.54.191.7 (talk) 17:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Law altered by Local Government to save money and remove responsibility for CRIMINAL failure

This Court is premitted to hold back room sessions to save money and remove rights from respondants without trial or conviction. Such rights include; housing, counceling, support services, and many more.

This Court is not permitted to seek ANY actions aginst Members of Local Government, whom are above the law until an Election is called, and members are elected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.54.191.7 (talk) 17:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Registrars will refuse legal papers at filling desk

Registrar/s has an unknown and un-documented right to refuse "correct" paperwork fillings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.54.191.7 (talk) 18:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)