Talk:Magic Mile
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Criteria
It barely met with B class criteria, so I do not know why it was put up for GA class article nominations. Dreamy 15:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Failed "good article" nomination
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 9, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Yes
- 2. Factually accurate?: Yes
- 3. Broad in coverage?: No
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Yes
- 5. Article stability? Yes
- 6. Images?: Yes
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. — Dreamy 15:33, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall: