Talk:Maggie Williams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

There's an extensive biography about Williams here. --165.134.208.120 (talk) 16:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV

It seems this article quickly became a huge load of WP:UNDUE weight given to scandals or insinuations of such. These aren't even placed into coherent encyclopedic context and seem to very easily violate WP:BLP. --Veritas (talk) 04:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I agree and I'm removing all of it. It's certainly undue weight and potential BLP problems - looks like people googled her name and found whatever they could of that nature and threw it into the article. I had tried to rework it more neutrally, but it was still out of whack. Tvoz |talk 18:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

The Whitewater investigations were a very significant part of the Clinton Administration and Maggie Williams name first gained notoriety in those Congressional hearings. I agree there were a few far fetched comments on here in the past, but the Whitewater hearings were a very significant part of her public life and I think it should be added under a section with it's own name. (Dbcraft (talk) 18:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC))

I do not deny that the Whitewater investigation was important or that Williams played an important role in it. However, such a section would need to be balanced and extremely well-cited and cannot provide undue weight to the subject in relation to her overall notability. --Veritas (talk) 20:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)