User talk:Madmath789

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Madmath789, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

And don't foget, the edit summary is your friend. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 22:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Re: fine topology

I replied on my talk page. In short, I don't have good ideas, but asked at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. Hopefully somebody will answer. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:31, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The revert

I see that you did not notice that I reverted because there was a blank edit summary – be sure to check that next time. — Brendenhull (T + C) at 22:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Algorithmic topology
Ḏāl
Maghreb Arabic
Ġayn
Poisson kernel
Moroccan Arabic
Hans Wehr transliteration
Weak operator topology
Standard Arabic Technical Transliteration System
Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi
Upper topology
Algerian Arabic
Abdullah Ibn al-Muqaffa
Ḫāʼ
Ṯāʼ
Ẓāʼ
Homotopical algebra
Vacuum energy
Cleanup
Invariants of tensors
Modern Standard Arabic
Classical Arabic
Merge
Logical biconditional
List of Japanese cities by population
Sino-Korean
Add Sources
Squeeze theorem
Bronzeware script
Volapuk encoding
Wikify
Habib
Wavel Ramkalawan
Constructivist epistemology
Expand
Biang biang noodles
Akkadian language
Islamic art

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] please clarify

Lethe - since the time you said you were away, I have seen loads of changes on my watchlist you have made - are you REALLY having a break?!? :-) Madmath789 22:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Can you be more specific? I have taken a look at Special:Contributions/Lethe, and I do not see any edits in my account after I announced my departure on Wednesday. Were the edits problematic? Maybe you confused User:lethe with User:Lenthe or something. -lethe talk + 21:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I would like to help you, but I HAVE HAD IT WITH WIKIPEDIA!

I will not help with Wikipedia anymore. Whatever I do, the bullies delete. You can email me. email address on my user page. MathStatWoman 20:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Waring's problem

I'm sorry for having misunderstood the intention of O(k) in Wooling's upper bound, so thank you for noticing my edit. As it stood 0 <= O(k) <= ck was, for me, the only logical explanation for the formula. Could you please provide some reference on the page as to what O means in this case, and add it to O as well? Thanks. Davilla 17:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Category tags

Hi, MadMath789!

Thanks for the note over on Cauchy-Riemann equations. I was sort of muddle-headed the day I wrote that stuff.

Anyway, I just wanted to mention something. I've been pulling some articles over into my user space to make major edits / expansions. Today I noticed a guideline and read all the way through it for the first time. The guideline suggests that when you have a copy of a live article in your user-space, you put the <nowiki></nowiki> tags around the category tags at the end of the article so your private copy won't end up on a category list that a user might look at while searching a topic. One should take the tags out when putting the article back in the main name-space.

So anyway, I had violated this guideline myself, and went and fixed it up after I read about it. And then when I went to check (via the [Category:Complex analysis] tag) that I had cleaned up after myself, your name popped up as a category! So I invaded your user-space and put the <nowiki></nowiki> tags into your working copy of "Jensen's formula". I hope you don't mind.

Have a great day!  ;^> DavidCBryant 22:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for December 11th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 50 11 December 2006 About the Signpost
From the editor: New feature
Board of Trustees expanded as three new members are appointed Wikimedia Foundation releases financial audit
Arbitration Committee elections continue, extra seat available Female-only wiki mailing list draws fire
Trolling organization's article deleted WikiWorld comic: "Redshirt"
News and notes: Fundraiser plans, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)