Talk:Madame Defarge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
KAyLiE4kAyLiE: The reason for the revert was due to the fact that the personality section was simply a long, long essay. There is nothing wrong in there being a character analysis section for Madame Defarge, but writings on Wikipedia should be as concise as possible.
As suggestions: quotes are not necessary, although even if you chose to retain a selection, the citation in parentheses should not be page numbers, since different editions of the same book exist. I would suggest something like "Book the Third, Chapter 3."
2.7182V 06:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
The second and third paragraphs seem to be taken from Sparknotes: http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/twocities/canalysis.html. We should change this to avoid volating copyrights. 128.208.60.88 (talk) 01:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)