Talk:Mad Catz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. | |
| Stub | rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on September 24, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
[edit] Critisism
That whole part seems to be completely biased and only refects on their N64 controller. Wikipedia is not a place to vent your frustrations. Plus, the article cited doesn't say anything about the company loosing money due to shoddy products. Infact, the guys from Reviews on the Run/Electric Playground are very (sorry but I can't cite this) pro-Mad Catz. Personally, I am too. But anyway, I'm erasing it, and anybody who thinks that they can cite sources on that and expand on true critisims, by all means, go for it. ---SilentRAGE! 09:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone else think the comment "the cheapest products and break easily" is just someone who got a bit wound up when they broke their Mad Catz controller? Either way, it's innapropriate and poorly worded, so I am deleting it.
I've had pretty shoddy luck with a few of their products personally.
- The N64 controller - analogue stick wore out very quickly, some buttons were a bit loose
- a multi-system RF adaptor - contact pins were misaligned out of the box, very difficult to get a color signal
- PlayStation 2 memory cards - I/O speed decreased gradually until finally the card became intermittently write-only or even completely inaccessible within a couple of months
There are more, but I can't think of them right now. After all that mess, I've stopped buying from them. 24.40.172.245 14:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC) I'm considering removing the overly long list(s) and moving them into a "list of products" section, thoughts? As is, the article is hard to read; the listings seem like an attempt to keep it from being a stub --69.247.164.232 20:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Madcatz Nintendo GameCube Memory Cards do not work with the Nintendo Wii. --Zathic 01:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hell, they don't even work with the GameCube. GaeMFreeK 00:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
I have steared away from Mad Catz products also seeing that most of them are hit-or-miss in functionality. While I encourage people to write reviews and even post opinions on Wikipedia, I still expect Wikipedia's neutrality standards to be upheld if anyone is going to take articles seriously(as depending on them for unbiased facts).
I'm not here to say we should run rampant with our problems, I'm just here to agree with the others that citations are necessary and to add in my two cents that while some of this company's products work, some of them don't; I happen to be getting the ones that don't work.
BH March 11, '08, 5:13 AM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.153.255.178 (talk) 10:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Madcatz logo.jpg
Image:Madcatz logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
