User talk:Mabdul

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Table

Resolved.

I need help! The question is described on the help desk here: [1]

Gecko WebKit KHTML Presto Prince XML Amaya Adobe SVG Viewer Batik DENG Renesis
SVG 1.1 Tiny (SVGT) Partial Partial Partial 8.0 Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial
Basic (SVGB) Partial Partial Partial Mostly Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial
Full Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Mostly Partial Partial
1.2 Tiny No No No Partial - 9.5a ? ? No Partial ? Partial
sXBL No No No No No No No Yes No No
XBL 2.0 No No No No No No No No No No

[edit] Table

Sorry I couldn't find a solution. You can shrink it by putting padding: 0; into the style but you still can't control the width. x42bn6 Talk Mess 23:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wrong kind of slash

Hi; you used the wrong kind of slash in this edit; it broke the template. Be sure to use the forward slash "/" rather than the backslash "\" when using the same ref in multiple places. Whistling42 (talk) 20:48, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

thanks; i made it not by copy and paste and sometmes there are msitakes if i didn't rev my own edit :rolleyes: Mabdul (talk) 00:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] khtml -> webkit presumption(s)

Your edit in the graphics comparison makes false presumptions, imho. You can't take any khtml features and say webkit gets them automatically. khtml uses "KParts", part of KDE for image rendering anyways. I think apple did NOT port that. Also, for a long time khtml supported more selectors (correctly) than webkit, as their codebases are not identical. So I wouldn't make presumptions based on the "inheritance" unless that feature is part of khtml (not any other part of kde) and was in before the webkit fork. This points to the issue that one of the tables lists "khtml" instead of "kparts". This example shows (imho) that KParts is clearer. --Grey (talk) 20:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] note to my own

and