User talk:M.e

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi! It's nice to see another person working on Byzantine Empire stuff...especially Pechenegs, that is one of those articles I was going to eventually write "someday," but never got around to it. Adam Bishop 19:26, 27 May 2004 (UTC) — Thanks, it's just a stub, do write it. m.e. 09:51, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)


My comments on Page production process are now at User talk:M.e/Production Wikipedia.

Contents

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Sydney

Want to join? I'm still formulating policy. Incidently, there is a message board Wikipedia:Australian wikipedians' notice board - Ta bu shi da yu 06:09, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

:P - Ta bu shi da yu 11:45, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)


[edit] Neomodernism

I've started to add material. There is also the movment in architecture and the visual arts to consider. Stirling Newberry 13:35, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)


[edit] American "dialog"

Hi. I changed the spelling of dialog because Platonic writing is always called "The Socratic Dialogue", and so for consistency the rest of article should use that (British) spelling. Batmanand | Talk 09:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Essendon Keilor College

G'day. Just a note telling you that by this diff to Essendon Keilor College you reverted to a prior version that contained libellous material. Please take care to ensure you are reverting pages to a legitimate and not vandalous version by using the "show preview" function before each edit. Thankyou, Jpe|ob 12:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

It just demonstrates the need to be absolutely sure that you are reverting to a version that you want. Happy editing! Jpe|ob 01:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] copyright permission

Could you tell me how i can show copyright permission. you deleted some quotes on balagangadhara article. --SV 19:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

to add to the previous, the book from which the quote was made is itself in the public domain [1]. So i will go ahead add revert back to the older version of the article. --SV 19:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Persian language writers and authors

per your comment here [2] could you take another look and help improve the article? Weiszman 22:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

actually, the reason I wrote to you was because of your comment above [3] You don't need to be an expert in Persian literature to help improve the general outlook and flow of the article, and consider renaming it as per your suggestion. Weiszman 23:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Graff, Missouri

Human settlements are interesting, even small ones. Perhaps more substantial info would be why the place was called that way, who made that decision, all the subsequent local history, and some pictures. But eh...Zigzig20s 00:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wargames Research Group

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Wargames Research Group, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "now has user name and password on the proxy"

Decline reason: "You have not been blocked directly. As this is the case, this request has been declined. — nat.utoronto 09:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

  • I don't understand this -- how is being blocked 'directly' any different from being blocked? I am the only person who can use this proxy as I have a userid and password on it. So it is not an open proxy. m.e. (talk) 16:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Being block directly means that there would be a record of the block here. If you are blocked from editing, you need the proper template to request an unblock, or else there is nothing we can do. nat.utoronto 17:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Wargames Research Group

An editor has nominated Wargames Research Group, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wargames Research Group and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock request

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Not using proxy (you can guess why probably from the timing...)"

Decline reason: "This account is not blocked directly. Please see {{autoblock}}. — Sandstein (talk) 06:11, 7 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Membership application for Wikimedia Hong Kong is now open


08:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Dear wikipedian:

I am glad to tell you that, out local chapter, Wikimedia Hong Kong is now open for membership applications. The Chapter will hold several Recruitment days in different locations in the territory.


Please check out the time, date and location of the recruitment days here, and please hand in your application in person in the one that is convenient to you. Please follow the instruction on that page, and better prepare all the documents needed before the recruitment day.


Please feel free to contact us via this email, whether you can or cannot attend recruitment days, for further details or special assistances.


Regards,
Sith lord darth vader (talk)


[edit] Dominationism

A tag has been placed on Dominationism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 05:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

The problem is that the article was way too vague to be kept. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 06:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)