Talk:Lyndon LaRouche

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Skip to table of contents    

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lyndon LaRouche article.

Article policies
Archives: 1, 2
Lyndon LaRouche is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
December 22, 2005 Featured article candidate Not promoted
Remember that article talk pages are provided to coordinate the article's improvement only, and are not for engaging in discussion of off-topic matters not related to the main article. User talk pages are more appropriate for non-article-related discussion topics. Please do not use this page as a discussion forum for off-topic matters. See talk page guidelines.
This is not a forum for general discussion of Lyndon LaRouche.
Any such messages will be deleted. Please limit discussion to improvement of the article.
This is a controversial topic that may be under dispute. Please read this page and discuss substantial changes here before making them.
Make sure to supply full citations when adding information and consider tagging or removing uncited/unciteable information.
Wikipedian An individual covered by or significantly related to this article, Lyndon LaRouche, has edited Wikipedia as
Cberlet (talk · contribs).
This user's editing has included this article
.

Readers are encouraged to review Wikipedia:Autobiography for information concerning autobiographical articles on Wikipedia.

Wikipedian An individual covered by or significantly related to this article, Lyndon LaRouche, has edited Wikipedia as
Dking (talk · contribs).
This user's editing has included this article
.

Readers are encouraged to review Wikipedia:Autobiography for information concerning autobiographical articles on Wikipedia.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
News This page has been cited as a source by a media organization. The citation is in:


Archives


Contents

[edit] Scientology

The article on the Scientology "e-meter" states that "Scientology minister Lyndon LaRouche" was the first to use it. A different Lyndon LaRouche? I don't see anything about Scientology in this article. Proxy User (talk) 05:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Good catch. It appears to have been vandalism. I've removed it. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 06:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] It should be "Iran-Contra scandal", not "Irangate"

"In 1995, he wrote to a Swedish newspaper declaring that Olof Palme was assassinated because of his knowledge of the Irangate scandal."

Could someone change "Irangate" to "Iran-Contra"? I recall neither a gate nor fence-like material of any kind being involved during that scandal.

But seriously, adding a "-gate" suffix to refer to a scandal is just irritating journalistic laziness and improper use of a noun--what do gates have to do with scandals?

Torgman1 (talk) 02:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Presidential candidate

"Category:United States presidential candidates" has been disambiguated to candidates per election between 1789 and 2008. I have been unable to add the appropriate categories for LaRouche as this page is protected. Could an administrator make the necessary changes? Dimadick (talk) 14:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

That turns one category into eight, but it's worse for Harold Stassen. Seeing no objection I've made the edit. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 03:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Criticism is not sufficient detailed

The criticisms of LaRouche in reputable published sources are not adequately represented on this page. I would like to add a flag that the page fails the NPOV test. --Cberlet (talk) 13:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Operation Mop-Up

The dubious FBI accusations at the end of the section are supported by a (poor) reference to a defunct LaRouche website. They should be deleted. John Nevard (talk) 05:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Minor copy edit suggestion

Someone with the power to do so should place a period after the word "cult" in the second sentence of the second paragraph of this article, before the reference tags. I'd do so myself, but the protection level here prevents me, lowly regular user, from doing so. Adlerschloß (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Done. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 18:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Could you also add [[Category:American foreign policy writers]] ? --172.193.62.190 (talk) 06:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Any objections? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 06:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Other than granting him an importance he in no way deserves -- it's not as if any of his works are best-sellers, widely read, or influential -- no, not really. --Calton | Talk 07:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
No objection -- make it so. --Anti-Gorgias (talk) 03:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
I appears that Calton already objected. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 04:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
If you will re-read his statement, in response to your question, "Any objections?" he concludes with "no, not really." I don't object, either -- it seems straightforward to me. --Marvin Diode (talk) 14:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Are any of his writings published outside the movement? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 20:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC)