Talk:Lydia Hearst-Shaw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Shaw is her last name

Her last name is Shaw, NOT Hearst. Her father is Shaw, mother is Hearst. Look at Forbes magazine (in the link below) and hundreds of other places that her last name is Shaw.[1]—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.201.146.55 (talk • contribs) 05:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC) You cant blame her for wanting to use Hearst. She's just milking the name for all it's worth. She knows the name is famous and she can make proper use of it. It will promote her career. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.50.15 (talk) 01:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Maintenance tags

This article has actually decreased in size as a lot of unattributed and/or PoV statements have been removed. I have deleted the three maintenance tags from the top of the article: the text no longer needs cleanup, it doesn't use an unencyclopedic tone and doesn't use peacock terms. These were concerns at one point, but as of this writing the article does not present any of these problems. (It does need to be expanded, using verifiable sources.) -- Gyrofrog (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Someone re-applied the three tags but, again, the current (and very short) version of the article does not warrant such concerns. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 21:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Meanwhile, there have been frequent reversions to the unattributed, PoV version of the article. I have notified the editors in question that only the Evening Standard is mentioned as a source, but its quotation is not presented in a neutral tone and does not give a specific citation (e.g. date, page number). The other information restored via the reverts does not attribute any sources at all. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 03:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)