User talk:Lwnf360
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome!
|
[edit] September 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to AP1000, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: AP1000 was changed by Lwnf360 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-09-10T05:03:33+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 09:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chernobyl disaster
Hi, you recently added a pov tag to one of the section of Chernobyl disaster entry, however you did not elaborate on the talk page. Could you add your comment on what's the pov, and what you think needs to be done to correct it at Talk Page for Chernobyl disaster? --Riurik(discuss) 05:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor images
Firstly, thank you for your additions to Wikipedia.
The images you uploaded to this article look very good, however, you tagged them with the logo tag. I have tried to demonstrate the proper way to write a fair-use rational with the first one. You essentially must make an argument to keep the copyrighted content in every case, and if you leave them as they are now, they will probably get deleted sooner or later. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 05:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mediation
There's a discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution that covers the procedures.
Since the offending pie chart was replaced, the only solid complaint I can make is about the Gore quotation. But that seems somewhat petty and not worth looking for mediation.
What prompted my interest in seeking mediation has more to do with Cyrilledunant's attitude that he's entitled to change anything he chooses and revert any changes others make to his changes. The fact is, some of his writing is unintelligible. Beyond that, he's determined to keep the junk in the article just to prove he can.
On the other hand, the discussion isn't supposed to be a bitch fest and this whine seems undignified even to me.
So, what part of the disagreement are you interested in? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cde3 (talk • contribs) 06:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:AP1000SimulatedNight.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:AP1000SimulatedNight.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 21:02, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism!
Hello, Lwnf360, and welcome to Wikiproject Catholicism! Thank you for your generous offer to help
contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing! --Thw1309 (talk) 08:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] SB Box
Hehe, thanks. Stale Fries taste better 00:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RBMK moderator
- I don't think you read it correctly. The point was that Western reactors are differently moderated from the RBMK and therefore cannot duplicate the Chernobyl accident.
- If memory serves, RBMK reactors now use more highly enriched uranium than they did when the accident happened which somehow makes them safer (presumably by preventing some idiot removing all of the control rods). Man with two legs (talk) 22:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Nuclear safety
- See User_talk:Anthony_Appleyard#Seeking_advice_please. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Please see Talk:Nuclear power#Dispute about new matter. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- Thank you for your support vote at Roman Catholic Church NancyHeise (talk) 04:44, 4 June 2008 (UTC)