Talk:Lupercus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology .

This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia.
Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

[edit] Merge

Agree.Julia Rossi (talk) 00:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Disagree. One deals with rituals, one deals with a diety. Though the ritual may be in honor of the diety, they are two seperate things. (AFLitt (talk) 21:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC))

Encyclopedic treatment of subjects is different from dictionary treatments, which break thoughts into their smallest constituent parts. Encyclopedic thinking seems to elude many at Wikipedia. Lupercus is meaningless except in the context of what we can surmise from Lupercalia. --Wetman (talk) 23:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)