User talk:Lumal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, an article you recently created, Lumal, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. -- lucasbfr talk 13:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices, as you did with Lumal. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. DarkSaber2k 13:57, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:IBat90&2minutes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IBat90&2minutes.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:IBat90&2minutesNEW.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:IBat90&2minutes.jpg. The copy called Image:IBat90&2minutes.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 07:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:ChuckNorrisSTUDIOrules.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ChuckNorrisSTUDIOrules.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of Carney's on sunset

A tag has been placed on Carney's on sunset requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 08:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Carney's on sunset

I have nominated Carney's on sunset, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carney's on sunset. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Toddst1 (talk) 09:52, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:JohnGBarrettKCTM.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. James086Talk | Email 12:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Marty-Mcsorley-on-catalina-trip-BodyGloveBob.com-boat .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Marty-Mcsorley-on-catalina-trip-BodyGloveBob.com-boat .jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Lionheart/Wrong Bet/A.W.O.L. - Absent Without Leave (film)

A tag has been placed on Lionheart/Wrong Bet/A.W.O.L. - Absent Without Leave (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. // Chris (complaints)•(contribs) 02:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Lionheart/Wrong Bet/A.W.O.L. - Absent Without Leave (film)

A tag has been placed on Lionheart/Wrong Bet/A.W.O.L. - Absent Without Leave (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Basketball110 the pages I've messed up completely 02:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:H-duty5.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:H-duty5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I have deleted this image as an advertisement. If you have the original image as you say, please upload it without the watermarks. -Thanks Nv8200p talk 13:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:CarneyGIANTkid-web.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CarneyGIANTkid-web.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 21:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Patrick Swayze. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SWik78 (talk) 15:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

people who express support who actually know him John G. Barrett unconstructive edits how interesting Lumal (talk) 10:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Dive N' Surf

A tag has been placed on Dive N' Surf, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Booglamay (talk) 10:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image Rights for Image:DorianYates-RayMentzer.jpg; image:KirkMaillet&MikeMentzer2.jpg and Image:Dorian-yates.jpg

We have recieved an e-mail via OTRS about the copyright status of these images. The image tags indicate that you are the rights holder and that you took the images personally. To assist me with dealing with the enquiry, please can you confirm that this is correct and that you do definitely hold the rights to these images? I am sorry if this sounds a bit terse but I'm not allowed to publish the contents of any e-mails sent via OTRS so I'm kind of faced with having to simply ask the question. Thanks Spartaz Humbug! 21:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:BEST-Girls.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BEST-Girls.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:3rdBLACK.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:3rdBLACK.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright Violation on Jim Jones the Peoples Temple use of Liberation theology

Hi, Lumal. The text in this edit was a direct copy of this book review and therefore, violates wikipedia's copyright policy. In addition, a book review on a book about Jones is irrelevant in an article about Jones. The actual facts about Jones himself (not the book reviewers take on a book) are what would be relevant. Finally, it was largely repetitive of the rest of the article. Mosedschurte (talk) 20:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)