User talk:Luketenley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Piteagle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Piteagle.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please use the edit summary and preview

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks!

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Matt 17:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm really serious - it'd be nice if you could have descriptive edit summaries and not show 10 edits for what could have been one or two if you'd previewed. Thanks! --Matt 05:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pittsburgh International Airport

Luketenley, thanks for the new pics from PIT. I live in Pittsburgh, but don't get out there enough to get (good) pictures of any part of it. I wanted to ask you if you could get some of a few things and then we could decide what works in each section. If it's not easy for you to get any of these pics, please don't feel obligated, but these are just ones that I wanted toget next time I was at the airport:

  • Maybe a better picture of the ticketing area. I took the one currently there when I was flying PIT-AUA, but it was very early and not only barely shows the size, but doesn't show a large number of people, or the large number of airlines.
  • CORE (A view of the whole CORE might be better than just the mobile.)
  • US Airways Club entrance
  • Maybe rather than just have the AirMall logo in that section, we could use a picture of actual parts of the AirMall showing the different shops. I was thinking the area right at the end of Concourse B/CORE, but if you had a different idea go ahead.
  • Southwest Gate in Concourse A
  • US Airways Gate in Concourse A/B
  • Concourse B, looking down the length of the Concourse
  • From the Mr. Rogers display, a view looking down Concourse C that gives an impression of the size of that one and also might include United/airTran/jetBlue gates.
  • Concourse D from a perspective/location similar to the one in C. I wanted to add a picture for each concourse similar to the one from A there now.

Hahaha, sorry to ask you of all this, but I got up today and saw these new pictures put up and saw an opportunity.;-) Thanks! NW036 13:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Contact

Hey, yeah I have AIM. I'll leave you another message with it tomorrow sometime. I was up late writing a paper, but since I'm leaving now anyways, I might be able to talk tomorrow. NW036 06:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Acaa.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Acaa.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:58, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] PIT history

Luketenley, it is great additions you have been making to the PIT page, however PLEASE leave comments on discussion when I inform everyone that I will be reorganizing the page, and please consider joining the Wikiproject Pittsburgh page to discuss further ideas for PIT and other pages, we would love to have you. No one user has a monopoly on the best page design but what I think we are forgetting is that people do not visit the PIT page for what it was in 1945, 1975 or 1985, but in the last few years and today and tommorrow, it is afterall an airport page. If you look at my contribs and page starts on wiki you'd probably see very quickly that hours spent building Pitt football record databases for the 1930s and researching the history of Oakmont and KDKA don't paint me as an enemy to history, but I do realize that PIT is not the Smithsonian, and the Smithsonian is NOT PIT. If you insist on a history blub on the page go for it but not NINE paragraphs at the very beginging, I just don't see the logic of that much that soon on a page of an operations center which is what every airport is. Please add your thoughts on the discussion page of PIT I posted weeks ago I was going to reorg the page, along with a small consensus from the Wikiproject for Pittsburgh forum. Hholt01 04:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] User Page

Just made a quick tweak -- which I hope you don't mind, as I suspect it reflects your intention. Nice PIT edits, by the way. DagnyB 20:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Relaunching WikiProject Pittsburgh meetups

You are receiving this message because you are a member of the WikiProject Pittsburgh. In the past we have discussed a meetup idea - let's see if we can make it a reality during the summer. Please see this thread for more information.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  23:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Pit airport logo

Hey Luke. Someone replaced Image:Pitlogo.jpg with something else, so I reuploaded it with the image you uploaded. Can you do me a favor and edit Image:PitAirportLogo.jpg to state how you came by the photo? Thanks --Matt 20:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] PIT Gate Info

Luketenley, I follow a lot of your postings on airliners.net but since I'm not a member I cannot ask you a question. You said PIT has 6 international gates, which numbers are those? Bcamp09 19:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

The gates at the end of C concourse are international. There is a glass wall part way down the concourse just past jetBlue's gates. Everything beyond that used to be used for international. Not so much nowadays. USA3000 does operate down there a C61. luketenley 3:35, 04 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Southwest gate renovations

You work at the airport, right? Well do you know the types of renovations Southwest is doing to their gates? Bcamp09 (talk) 03:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] klm-northwest

so do you think that the international flight to Amsterdam from pit will work out, have you heard anything, also have you heard of gate reassignments or new airlines 71.240.0.97 (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)