User talk:Lukesed
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi - It appears that you voted for Wikipedia:Article_Creation_and_Improvement_Drive#Dvorak_Simplified_Keyboard but forgot to add your signature. Thought you might want to take care of that. Regards, Keesiewonder 02:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] You helped choose Cactus as this week's WP:AID winner
MER-C 03:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You helped choose Death as this week's WP:AID winner
AzaBot 01:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You helped choose Universe as this week's WP:AID winner
AzaBot 21:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] You helped choose Wall Street Crash of 1929 as this week's WP:ACID winner
AzaBot 01:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Blair Witch edits
Good reasoning over semantics about the profit margin. However, you need to cite where someone has noted that claim of the widest profit margin in history. If you cannot cite it, then its just you making that observation, and that constitutes original research. For that reason, it could net be allowed to remain. I am going to give you a couple of days to find a citation for the statement or revise it. After that time, I will have to revert/remove it. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 17:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- I can't find any reference to the profit margin outside of blogs and forums, but anyone could look at box office mojo and figure it out quickly that this film has to have the best. I suppose for that to count for anything someone would have to publish some sort of analysis of the data on the site stating this. Would it be appropriate to say that it had a "remarkably high" profit margin, or that it had the lowest production budget of any film that made x amount of money? For all I know someone may have made a film for .50c that made $50,000 in arthouse theaters.Lukesed (talk) 18:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)