User talk:LukeSurl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
I reserve the right to screw up any edits I make - If you think I've done something wrong, please Fix it. I really won't object to my edits being reverted, chances are I won't even notice. LukeSurl 13:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Your proposal
I noticed the proposal regarding third-party wikis that you posted on the proposals Village pump. I think this is a really good suggestion, with a couple qualifyers. I think you should move it to a Wikipedia namespace proposal page, such as Wikipedia:Proposal to link to specialized third-party wikis or something along those lines. I'll leave it to you to make any move (it's your proposal), but the suggestion is open. Nihiltres(t.c.s) 14:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mistake
Sorry, I was trying to cfd an article. See, Word Up Magazine. I was using the Raditz one as an example to use the deletion tags, I accidently pressed the save button instead of the preview one. My fault entirely. Perhaps you can help me? ~I'm anonymous
- No prob. I would've done the same if I were you. Its just that I wasn't sure of how to use a deletion template, so I went to an article I've seen before that was cfd'd and decided to copy/paste that tag. Dumbwittingly, I pressed the "save button", (grr...) and was about to revert myself when there was an edit conflict. I wasn't sure what was going on, until now. What should become of the Word Up Magazine article then? ~I'm anonymous
- Looks quite complicated. I remember reading about a similar wiki-device called WP:POPUPS. Is that anyway alike to it? ~I'm anonymous
- I wish I've seen this page before. Ok, I'll tag the page with {{Db-reason}} using the explanation I was using before. Thanks for your help. ~I'm anonymous
- I wasn't gonna say this before, but maybe you'll find it interesting: do you believe in deja vu? I had remembered this scene from a dream I had last night: I was editing Wikipedia (yes, I edit in my sleep); all of a sudden, I did a big mistake by pressing the save button and ruined something - another user (guess it was you) wanted me to explain for my edits. Talk about scary. That's why I was a bit dazed when that edit conflict occurred. Maybe I'll take a wiki-break, yeah, maybe I'm tired... ~I'm anonymous
- I got your message. What you just told me is very interesting. Seriously, I do have deja vu only when I'm tired, so does my family (excluding my sister, don't know why). I believe you're right, it is neurological. Is there an article on Wikipedia that talks about this? ~I'm anonymous
- Cool. Let me know when there's an answer, k? Peace. ~I'm anonymous
- I got your message. What you just told me is very interesting. Seriously, I do have deja vu only when I'm tired, so does my family (excluding my sister, don't know why). I believe you're right, it is neurological. Is there an article on Wikipedia that talks about this? ~I'm anonymous
- I wasn't gonna say this before, but maybe you'll find it interesting: do you believe in deja vu? I had remembered this scene from a dream I had last night: I was editing Wikipedia (yes, I edit in my sleep); all of a sudden, I did a big mistake by pressing the save button and ruined something - another user (guess it was you) wanted me to explain for my edits. Talk about scary. That's why I was a bit dazed when that edit conflict occurred. Maybe I'll take a wiki-break, yeah, maybe I'm tired... ~I'm anonymous
- I wish I've seen this page before. Ok, I'll tag the page with {{Db-reason}} using the explanation I was using before. Thanks for your help. ~I'm anonymous
- Looks quite complicated. I remember reading about a similar wiki-device called WP:POPUPS. Is that anyway alike to it? ~I'm anonymous
[edit] OOTS
I have to disagree with your recent edit removing the "crayoning" effects. It is extensive in the print versions of oots that are not part of the online comic, I direct your attention to the bullet points in the middle of this page Order of the Stick: Start of Darkness. So this will become a reoccuring thematic element in the comic, and deserves the paragraph you edited out. Timmccloud 22:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] image:Chiral.jpeg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, image:Chiral.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. isilanes (talk|contribs) 19:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Simulated Comic Product
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Simulated Comic Product, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Simulated Comic Product is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Simulated Comic Product, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pac Man.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Pac Man.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Article for deletion/Battlestar Wiki (3rd nom.)
The Battlestar Wiki aritlce has been nominated for deletion for the third time. Feel free to add your comments to the corresponding discussion.--DrWho42 (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Daily Grind.xls listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Daily Grind.xls, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Hut 8.5 17:39, 5 May 2008 (UTC)