User:LukasPietsch/Inscriptions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In the context of Arvanites, someone quoted an author who wanted to show that certain ancient inscriptions were in the Arvanitic language rather than in Ancient Greek. One of the inscriptions involved is the famous Dipylon inscription, the oldest known Greek alphabetic inscription. I cannot judge how plausible the language of the alleged "Arvanitic" readings is in itself, but both inscriptions quoted are obviously Greek, as everybody with a smattering of Ancient Greek can easily recognize. To say that these texts are not Greek is like saying that this sentence here is not English. The "Arvanitic" readings, on the other hand, are full of unsupported conjectures, ad-hoc redefinitions of the basic letter values, and some clear misreadings of quite unambiguous letters. The claim quoted is most certainly pseudo-science.
Note that the letter shapes in the transcriptions are archaic when compared to classical Greek, but nevertheless clearly readable in the knowledge of the Phoenician prototypes. Note also that both inscriptions are perfectly spelled (except for the last few letters of the Dipylon inscription, which is agreed to be problematic). Non-classical spellings (such as <ο> for later <ω, ου>; <ε> for later <η, ει>, and <φσ> for later <ψ>) are completely regular for pre-5th century inscriptions. In addition, the Dipylon inscription forms a perfect hexameter in Greek.
The original letters in both inscriptions have to be read like mirror-images, from right to left.
Contents |
[edit] 1.1. Dipylon inscription, Greek reading
[edit] 1.2. Dipylon inscription, Stylos' "Arvanitic" reading [1]))
Highlighted: Questionable readings, unjustified conjectures etc.
[edit] 2.1 Cumae inscription, Greek reading [2]:
[edit] 2.2. Cumae inscription, Stylos' "Arvanitic" reading ([3])
Highlighted: Questionable readings, unjustified conjectures etc.