User talk:Lucy-marie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] My Talk page
Any particular reason you undid Peter Symonds blanking of my talk page? rrcatto (talk) 10:35, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I assumed It was vandalism as page blankings not done by the user usually are.--Lucy-marie (talk) 10:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Symonds is a WP admin. I reckon my talk page can be blanked since it consisted of personal attacks by someone whose articles I nominated for deletion. rrcatto (talk) 10:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ian Huntley
Did you read reference 3? It contains information about the ears and fingers. rrcatto (talk) 19:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- The refrenece may have given them i nrefrence three, I however could not findthe information. Anyway the information is irrelevant and unecessary, POV and no wider context is given for the information.--Lucy-marie (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
If you read the BBC news article which is reference 3, you will see that it contains these lines:
"Victims' groups have condemned £11,000 government compensation entitlements for the families of Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells as "a pittance."
"The £11,000 figure Holly and Jessica's families will receive is the same as for a victim of crime who loses an ear or two fingers."
The sentence in the article that I edited was "The Wells and Chapman families received £11,000 in compensation for the murder of their daughters". A citation was called for that line. I supplied the citation and gave additional information which allows the reader to understand the £11,000 in context. As it stands, the reader is unable to understand what £11,000 represents. rrcatto (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Please also see - Soham_murders - where you will find the same information with the same reference. Quoted here:
The Wells and Chapman families received £11,000 in compensation for the death of their daughters, which was widely criticised in the media. The director of the Victims of Crime Trust, Clive Elliott, described the compensation as a "pittance".
There's a lot of duplication of content across those two articles. rrcatto (talk) 16:09, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- In my opinion the articles should be merged if you agree with that assessment plaese contribute to the apropritae discussion. As for the fingers and toes they are not directly relevant to the payout recieved, where as the other comments are diretly commenting on the compensation recieved.--Lucy-marie (talk) 16:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
-
-
Where is the correct spot?Found it. rrcatto (talk) 16:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- That is explained in the edit summary. The merger section of the Sohma Murders talk page, to be precise.--Lucy-marie (talk) 17:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Barnstar
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
Lucy-marie, Your tireless contributions, removal of vandalism and keeping a NPOV at all times improve the sense of community and enhance the helpfulness of wikipedia. I hereby grant you this barnstar in recognition of your dedication and hard work Fethroesforia 03:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Another
The Resilient Barnstar | ||
I know that in a lot of these disputes I've disagreed with you, but no good faith contributor should have to take the sheer volume of abuse you get. Things that normally would barely get noticed from anyone else get blown into major disputes when people see your name involved — and that's not how things ought to work around here. — iridescent 11:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC) |
[edit] Treaty Work
Member state[1] | Date | Result[2] | Deposition with Italian Government[3] |
---|---|---|---|
Lithuania | 11 November 2004 | Yes. Seimas: 84 to 4 in favour, 3 abstentions.[4] | 17 December 2004 |
Hungary | Yes. Országgyűlés: 323 to 12 in favour, 8 abstention.[5] | 30 December 2004 | |
Slovenia | Yes. Državni zbor: 79 to 4 in favour, 0 abstentions.[6] | 9 May 2005 | |
Italy | Yes. Camera dei Deputati: 436 to 28 in favour, 5 abstentions.[7] Yes. Senato della Repubblica: abstentions.[8] |
||
Spain | 28 April 2005 18 May 2005 |
Yes. Consultative referendum: 76.73% to 17.24% in favour, 6.03% blanks, 42.32% participation.[9][10] Yes. Congreso de los Diputados: 311 to 19 in favour, 0 abstentions.[11] Yes. Senado: 225 to 6 in favour, 1 abstention.[12] |
15 June 2005 |
Austria | 11 May 2005 25 May 2005 |
Yes. Nationalrat: Approved by show of hands with 1 against.[13] Yes. Bundesrat: Approved by show of hands with three against.[14] |
17 June 2005 |
Greece | 19 April 2005 | Yes. Βουλή των Ελλήνων: 268 to 17 in favour, 15 abstentions.[15] | 28 July 2005 |
Malta | 6 July 2005 | Yes. Il-Kamra: Agreed without a division.[16] | 2 August 2005 |
Cyprus | 30 June 2005 | Yes. Βουλή των Αντιπροσώπων: 30 to 19 in favour, one abstention.[17] | 6 October 2005 |
Latvia | 2 June 2005 | Yes. Saeima: 71 to 5 in favour, six abstentions.[18] | 3 January 2006 |
Luxembourg | 10 July 2005 25 October 2005 |
Yes. Consultative referendum: 56.52% to 43.48% in favour, 87.77% participation.[19][20] Yes. Châmber: 57 to 1 in favour, no abstentions.[21] |
30 January 2006 |
Belgium | 28 April 2005 19 May 2005 17 June 2005 20 June 2005 29 June 2005 19 July 2005 8 February 2006 |
Yes. Senaat/Sénat: 54 to 9 in favour, one abstention.[22] Yes. Kamer/Chambre: 118 to 18 in favour, one abstention.[23] Yes. Parlement Bruxellois/Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Parlement: 70 to 10 in favour, 0 abstentions.[24] Yes. Parlament der Deutschsprachigen Gemeinschaft: 21 to 2 in favour, no abstentions.[25] Yes. Parlement wallon: 55 to 2 in favour, 0 abstention.[26] Yes. Parlement de la Communauté française: 79 to 0 in favour, no abstentions.[27] Yes. Vlaams Parlement: 84 to 29 in favour, one abstention.[28] |
13 June 2006 |
Estonia | 9 May 2006 | Yes. Riigikogu: 73 to 1 in favour, no abstentions.[29] | 26 September 2006 |
Bulgaria | 1 January 2007 | Yes. Due to the provisions of Treaty of Accession 2005 | Not required |
Romania | 1 January 2007 | Yes. Due to the provisions of Treaty of Accession 2005 | Not required |
Slovakia | 11 May 2005 | Yes. Národná rada: 116 to 27 in favour, four abstentions.[30] | Pending. President of the republic has not yet signed the law. |
Germany | 12 May 2005 27 May 2005 |
Yes. Bundestag: 569 to 23 in favour, two abstentions.[31] Yes. Bundesrat: 66 to 0 in favour, three abstentions.[32] |
Pending. President of the republic has not yet signed the law (due to pending decisions of the Constitutional Court).[33] |
Finland incl. Åland[34] |
5 December 2006 Cancelled |
Yes. Eduskunta/Riksdag: 125 to 39 in favour, four abstentions.[35] Lagting[36] |
Pending |
France | 29 May 2005 Cancelled Cancelled |
No. Referendum: 54.68% to 45.32% against, 69.34% participation.[37][38] Assemblée Nationale: Sénat: |
|
Netherlands | 1 June 2005 Cancelled Cancelled |
No. Consultative referendum: 61.54% to 38.46% against, 63.30% participation.[39][40] Tweede Kamer: Eerste Kamer: |
|
Czech Republic | Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled |
Referendum: Senát: Poslanecká sněmovna: |
|
Denmark | Cancelled Cancelled |
Referendum: Folketing: |
|
Ireland | Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled |
Referendum: Dáil Éireann: Seanad Éireann: |
|
Poland | Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled |
Referendum: Sejm: Senat: |
|
Portugal | Cancelled Cancelled |
Referendum: Assembleia da Republica: |
|
Sweden | Cancelled | Riksdag: | |
United Kingdom | Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled |
Referendum: House of Commons: House of Lords: |