User talk:Luckyherb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Luckyherb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Alhutch 13:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP:AIV

First of all thank you for helping out in the fight against vandalism, you are doing good work.

I blocked the IP you reported to WP:AIV, however you should know that you should copy ( ctrl+c is the shortcut on a PC keyboard) the report format and fill it in below the comment section (i.e. right at the bottom of the page).

Here's an example, click on edit to view the code I used:

example_vandal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) Comment goes here Petros471 15:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Feel free to ask me any further questions. Petros471 15:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 204.98.2.26

Hi, Luckyherb. I noticed that you've warned user 204.98.2.26 about vandalism; I found a few further ones on Constitution. I don't know what the policies about this, but thought you'd want to know. I've corrected the additions, as least the ones I've found, but there appears to be a portion of the article that was removed. --Andymussell 02:49, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:195.172.86.1

Hi Luckyherb. You reported User:195.172.86.1 for vandalism on Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism. After reviewing his/her edits, these do not appear to be particularly evil vandalism, and the majority of them are not vandalism. (Although this one was). I'll keep an eye on his edits, but right now, a warning seems to have done the trick. Keep up the good work! Proto||type 08:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Question from 68.78.76.98 regarding incorrect revert

um, how do i email you to ask question? the information on bizzy bone page is wrong. and this is wikipedia. you can add or subtract. who says what you say is right. it's wrong. i'm a family member.

  • Sorry about that. We have big problems with page blanking, and so such edits tend to be reverted. Please accept my apologies for reverting a legitimate edit. To avoid this in the future, it would be a good idea to leave an edit summary describing why you made the change. Also, you should try to make your edits more "encyclopedic" to prevent confusion. To contact me you should just leave messages on my talk page. Anyway, thanks for pointing that out to me. Luckyherb 11:35, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

luckyherb, thank you for communication. and education. every time i edit one thing, because this artist is hustling kids -- 15 year olds are being used as "pawns" to sell the artist's tracks by a guy who poses with pics of himself with guns (the artist uses a hustler to hustle kids to hustle for him!) -- and when i go to edit page, so people do not assume the artist is a "praise God" "holy" man -- his so-called "walk" happened after he was evicted and the mother of his tenth child was four months from delivery -- he conveniently "diappeared" -- the page reverts.

your instructions helped me learn to edit "more encyclopedic" but i don't know where to leave "edit summary describing why changes made." even if a single word is edited, it reverts. that is NOT RIGHT. that mod has to stop and allow the wikipedia rules to apply to this topic as well.

  • If your edits keep getting reverted, you should try making a username for yourself (it's free), as most people tend to be skeptical of edits from an anonymous user. You should also let the person who reverted your edit know that they have made a mistake. As for the edit summary, there is a small box just above the save page button, you can type a short note in this box, then just save the page as usual. You could leave a notice on the Bizzy Bone discussion page, saying that your edits are not vandalism. Hopefully people will see this before reverting. Well, good luck with future edits. Feel free to ask me any other questions, and I will answer to the best of my ability (I'm still quite new too!). Luckyherb 05:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!

Hi Luckyherb, thank you for your interest in VandalProof and Congratulations! Although you did not quite meet our 250 mainspace edit minimum (you have 207) I decided based on your contribs to authorize you regardless :) You are now one of our authorized users, so if you haven't already simply download VandalProof from our main page, install and you're ready to go!

Warning to Vandals: This user is armed with VandalProof

You are also welcome to add {{User:Vishwin60/Userbox/VandalProof}} (which will add user box attached) or simply [[Category:Wikipedians using VandalProof|{{PAGENAME}}]] to your user page.

If you have any problems please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team! - Glen TC (Stollery) 06:41, 21 May 2006 (UTC) (VandalProof Moderator)

[edit] Response from 211.30.6.253

thanks for telling me how you do it thats awsome love your name dats also awsome

[edit] Hi

See you been reporting a lot of vandals! =) --|«Andeh?»|Talk? 10:54, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mindcraft1

Hey. Yes, I just reported him since he did not even stop after the final warning you gave him. Prolog 09:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] the noob

Thank you for your input to the noob DRV. If you want to make edits to improve the article during the DRV, the last content has been replicated in my userspace at User:Timmccloud/The_noob. Any help would be surely welcomed! Timmccloud 00:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Wow. You did a great job on the edit! My only real concern is for the reviews section - granted that needs cleaning up, but most of those were added because of notability concerns. One of the methods of establishing notability is that it is reviewed in places other than it's own website. Maybe we could put the section back in a much more simplified form to establish this notability? - Something like:
==Reviews==
What do you think? Timmccloud 23:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • I've been in email contact with Gianna since the first AfD, she has helped me source just about everything that is in the article now as far as external references are concerned. Unfortunately, she and I have both run out of "verifiable" references that we can use to satisfy the webcomic deleters. Timmccloud 02:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:VandalProof icon.jpg

Hello, Luckyherb. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:VandalProof icon.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Luckyherb. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 10:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)