User talk:LucifaelsBride

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Kagome Higurashi

If you hate Kagome so much (as your edits seem to indicate), then why do you bother to edit her article at all? Information about what fans feel is not appropriate material in an article, unless the article is specifically about fan reaction (in which case it would have to be documented). Also this is an article about Kagome, not Kikyo. So the section on her relationship with InuYasha, should focus on the InuYasha/Kagome relationship, not the InuYasha/Kikyo relationship. If you want to put in information about the relationship between InuYasha and Kikyo, put it in the articles about them. JRSpriggs 07:08, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm giving a firm, unbiased view of Kagome. It's true I like Kikyo better, but that doesn't mean I'm coming here to flame Kagome. I'm here to write a point of view of her that shows both her bad and good side. It is you who is spreading fan material, by terming Kagome as a Mary Sue when she's just a normal human, both kind and full of flaws. I'm here to write an description of her that gives fact, while you're here to explain what you love about her. Of the two of us, mine is a the more accurate and I'll stand by it until you grow tired of editing my stuff. - LucifaelsBride
Just so you know, the normal practice here is to put newer messages at the bottom (so everything reads from top to bottom in chronological order). Also we usually put new messages at a different level of indentation (using colons ":" at the beginning of the line) so that it is clear where one message ends and another begins.
Now to the substance. Let me take two examples. (1) "(I mean what woman would want another woman stealing her man?)" is not about Kagome or even the InuYasha anime or manga. It is about your personal philosophy and as such is not appropriate material for an encyclopedia article on Kagome. (2) "Despite these admirable qualities, Kagome also has flaws, like any normal human.", well duh! What does this add? If she was a saint who never did anything wrong or a fiend who never does anything good, then it would be worth mentioning. But being normal is, well, normal; and thus not worth mentioning. JRSpriggs 04:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I see, you insist on upholding tradition, following old ways, never seeking out a new path. I on the other hand prefer a totally different take on things. Anyways, enough about personal preference, on to your immature little rant. I thought you would have gotten the point by now that I don't care what you say. In case you haven't, I'll say it again. I don't care what you think. I'm telling Kagome like it is, instead of trying to canonify her. LucifaelsBride


Welcome!

Hello, LucifaelsBride, and welcome to Wikipedia, which is an encyclopedia and not a collaborative fan fiction writing exercise. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Kagome.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Kagome.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:KagomeApe.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:KagomeApe.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. GunnarRene 11:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning number 1

For persistently adding inappropriate material to Kagome Higurashi after being told that it is inappropriate, I am giving you the first warning for vandalism. Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. JRSpriggs 12:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

What I'm doing is NOT vandalism. If you've looked at my edits, you'll see that I've used no inappropriate words, etc in the Kagome Higurashi section. You'll see that I've protrayed Kagome in both a positive and a negative light )ie: I've shown her to be both beautiful and kind, but I've also portrayed her as having a bit of a temper. If you persist on irritating me with unwarranted claims, I will alert the REAL authorities. LucifaelsBride 14:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Making legal threats is a quick way to get banned on Wikipedia. I've seen your edits and the image you uploaded, and I would call it vandalism. If it is not, consider this. Kagome is not beautiful, kind, or a bitch; she's a fictional character. Just state the basics and let the readers come to their own conclusions. -- Ned Scott 18:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

By real authorities I meant the administrators of Wikipedia. As to you claims of "fictional characters", you're wrong. Kagome is kind and there are several examples of it in every episode. She does have a temper, solidifed by her abuse of the "sit!" command in various episodes of Inuyasha. Granted, she is a fictional character. But all fictional characters have a basic personality which they're drawn on and that is Kagome's basic personality.

Personally, I would consider you deletion of the entire "personality" section as vandalism, not my honest portrayal of her character.

LucifaelsBride 20:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Your honest portrayal of her character? What about those images you uploaded and tried to put on the article? You're not fooling anyone. -- Ned Scott 20:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

I admit that was infantile of me. You'll notice I only posted that once. I've grown out of that. LucifaelsBride 20:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning number 2

You continue to add inappropriate material to Kagome Higurashi. Here is just a small sample:

  1. "Some fans consider her incessant high-pitched squealing of "Inuyasha!!! Inuyasha!!!" to be annoying and repetitive but it is only born out of love and concern for the boy and not spite."
  2. "But she doesn't realize that if anyone has any right to Inuyasha, it should be Kikyo, as she was there first."
  3. "She never catches on that it might be wrong of her to not only replace another woman's place in history, but to also claim her soul and her man as her own. The woman in question is, of course, Kikyo."

Consequently, I am giving you vandalism warning number 2 — Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. JRSpriggs 08:40, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Again, that was not inappropriate stuff, it give both negative and positive (ie: neutral POV). Oddly, this is the way I've worded all my other edits in other section (refer to my contribution) and you did not seem to find a problem with any of them, only Kagome. This is shows that you're just a disgruntled fan of Kagome who hates seeing her portrayed in anything other than a flawless light.

LucifaelsBride 12:49, 22 January 2007 (UTC)LucifaelsBride

It is inappropriate because it is original research and fan opinion that has not business in a wikipedia articles. --Farix (Talk) 23:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD Nomination: Alexiel and Lucifer

An editor has nominated the article Alexiel and Lucifer for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexiel and Lucifer. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Alexiel and Lucifer during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 13:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD Nomination: Alexiel

An editor has nominated the article Alexiel for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexiel. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Alexiel during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 16:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)