User talk:Lucid/Archive X
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Note: This is the archive for unsigned entries, which are not automagically archived. Most of this is new users, mainly vandals.
Contents |
[edit] Weasel Words
I have provided some evidence on Weasel Words on the Margaret Thatcher talk page. I was interested to know if this is enough to post the "Weasel Words" tag. Thanks p.s. i do have more evidence
[edit] Deus ex Machina
I don't know how to use this, but just because an edit isn't the most polished doesn't mean its vandalism. What is wrong with the instance I described being a modern application of deus ex machina? Just because the book is about magic doesn't mean "its magic" is an explanation. Not only was the sorting hat burned, but it also doesn't explain how the sword could appear when it was in Griphook's possession; the entire book was deus ex machina "oh look Dobby outta nowhere to save the day!"; and the tone could be cleared up without deleting and sending me a message. Sounds like you overreacted to me.
http://btau.newsvine.com/_news/2007/07/23/854257-deus-ex-potter-a-harry-potter-review-with-spoilers
Doesn't look like original research to me. It looks like people are catching on to what the term means and how to apply it.
I just dont understand some basic editing stuff like creating links splitting the pages into chapters and stuff i just wonder if there is a basic manual for using wikipedia thanks!
[edit] blocking
hey how do u block vandals? does an admin have to do it or anybody can?
[edit] Friendly page warning: 3
Hi. Could you explain what that text you wrote on my page is for, cause I didn't get it:)
[edit] PartiallyClips
The article makes several separate claims as to the notability of the subject without changes. The fact that this comic strip currently runs in newspapers in major metropolitan markets alone is enough to denote its notability for inclusion. Its inclusion in the Attitude 3 print collection, and the fact that is is by the creator of Erfworld, another notable comic would each be acceptable criteria. It is agreed that the article could be fleshed out to include references to the work in print interviews (these do exist) and other additional sources. However, to say that the article makes no claims to notability of the subject is incorrect. Please remove this tag.
