Talk:Lucy Pinder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.


Contents

[edit] Removed WikiProject Pornography link (irrelevant(

Lucy Pinder is a glamour model, she has no connection with pornography and has never appeared in any pornographic work. From the project discussion page:

This project covers various topics related to the subject of pornography, such as:

Pornographic actors, actresses and models, as well as related infobox templates.

Additionally, the project is to implement a standard means of procuring information on pornographic actors, as well as to address what is proper for an encyclopedic article on porn stars.

Other porn-related biographies, such as notable porn film directors and photographers.

Other pornography-related topics, such as pornography genres.

The larger topic of pornography itself, and social and cultural issues surrounding it.

None of these topics have any relevance to Lucy Pinder or her work. She is not a pornographic model.

This also applies: Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. Any implication that Lucy Pinder is involved in pornographic work is certainly "potentially libellous".

213.162.113.17 (talk) 14:04, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Not a Page 3 girl

See the defintion of Page 3 girl elsewhere on Wiki - She had a contract with the Daily Star - she has not appeared on Page 3 of the Sun so she is isn't a Page 3 girl according the definition: --Rrose Selavy 14:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

see the following result of Googling "Lucy Pinder"

Lucy Pinder Official Web Site

welcome to the official web site of Lucy Pinder, page 3 girl for the Daily Star.

http://www.lucypinder.info/

note, she calls herself (or her manager calls her) a page 3 girl


Replaced statistics section with a model template.

There seem to be some web sites on the net willing to claim she's emphatically not fake-chested. Can someone cite a source for this?

It has been widely reported that she has not had any enhancement surgery. There is no physical evidence that she has. Surely the assumption should be that she hasn't had the surgery rather than that she has!ElephantMan2007 19:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Lucy has had no surgery of any kind. This is in fact one of the FAQs on the FAQ list on the forum on the official website (the forum is visible to registered users only). 213.162.113.17 (talk) 13:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Home town

"Lucy Katherine Pinder was born (20 December 1983 at Winchester, Hampshire, England) ... a freelance photographer spotted her sunbathing on the beach in her home town."

There is no beach in Winchester - it isn't even coastal - so perhaps someone could fix this?

Fix it yuorself, and feel free to edit other pages too.

It is possible that her home town and town of birth are different.

She was actually found on the beaches of bournemouth.

Lucy was born in Winchester, where she still lives, and "discovered" on Bournemouth beach. 213.162.113.17 (talk) 13:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Inappropriate Phrasing

"She was spotted sucking off somebody"; I am removing this sentence even though I am not sure if it is actually accurate (first time I have heard it) but mostly because I would not consider it the kind of language an Encyclopedia should use. Henners91 21:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Sidenote: It seems someone beat me to it, rather scary because I can't find it in the history, but I'm tired anyway so maybe my mind is wandering.... 2nd time this has happened (CAFOD article talking about poo but when I move to edit it, it's fixed :O) Henners91 21:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

It is not accurate, your edit was justified 213.162.113.17 (talk) 13:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] This is true!

She appeared at Loaded Nightclub in Spalding for the national Babes on a Bed competition on Easter Saturday 2007. Where Rachel, Tara and Hayley went through to the final

Needs CitationCstella23 16:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it is true. Unfortunately it will be a little hard to find an advert for the event over a year later... 213.162.113.17 (talk) 13:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Removed Photo

I removed the photo Image:Lucy Pinder17.jpg as it is unproperly licensed and is nudity that lacks any relevance for its content (see Jenna Jameson, there is no nudity).
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs

What, are you a sensitive little wimp or something?
to user:71.107.157.46, please sign your posts with four(4) Tilde ~~~~. I would also recommend you register an account to make further debate and discussion on the issue easier, as opposed to hiding behind your "supposed" IP address.
Gonzy fan, what is wrong with that, are you a single mother who complains about how you only look bad because you have had kids and that other women should not show off because they look hot, dont act like a wuss, wikipedia has no censorship so dont complain about irralivent stuff! --Metal to the Max! 10:54, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I have noticed that the title photograph has been removed. can one of the photos from the list fo three held at IMDB be used? i am a newbie, hence am not sure the rules on how to upload etc...thanks Deltasquared (talk) 04:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Futher to this last comment, I found a photo that has already been uploaded to the server, and I have set that as the article photo. If it is unsuitable, how can a more suitable one be uploaded?...thanksDeltasquared (talk) 07:02, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Airbrushed

Does anyone know how much (if any) airbrushing is oen to her photos? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.64.4 (talk) 22:56, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

Not a lot. Mole under left breast is frequently edited out as is mole on right side of neck. Photos in the Daily Star often feature airbrushed skin texture. Nearly all apparently naked photos are not really so, the knickers have been edited off. Apart from that - minimal. Shape and form are entirely natural. 213.162.113.17 (talk) 13:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)