Talk:Lucky dog
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I've worked on the format, I've added some history, and I've added statistics. I don't see how you could add an image to the explanation of a rule like this. What more does the article need?Mustang6172 22:08, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed move to beneficiary rule
I think that the article might need to be retitled 'beneficiary rule' seeing as how the 'lucky dog' title is more of a marketing title for Television networks instead of being in the official NASCAR lexicon Ryn2me (talk) 01:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support I'm with you, the name of the page should be "beneficiary rule" since that's what the article is about. Having "Lucky dog" as the title isn't necessarily encyclopedic.--KaseyKahneFan 02:42, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral I'm torn. "Lucky dog" is its WP:COMMONNAME, and "beneficiary rule" sounds more encyclopedic. I'm fine with either outcome. Royalbroil 04:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)